Edit Your Comment
Discussion of the Forex Contest GDMFX Forex Contest
Membre depuis Dec 28, 2016
posts 7
Membre depuis Mar 29, 2016
posts 5
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:20
Membre depuis Mar 29, 2016
posts 5
Weinstein posted:Croco_Dile posted:Weinstein posted:
IP tracking.
Gamblers in casino.
Trading is not a zero sum game.
There is no risk.
Weinstein, you really need a good avatar !
Don't be faceless.....
Good luck in trading ! Your live account looks really good ! 😎
Indeed.
Thank you!
IP tracking. - agree, although there are ways to mask it.
Gamblers in casino - agree, if you are not a professional card counter or poker player
Trading is not a zero sum game - agree, nothing to dispute
There is no risk. - Seriously? Even a decision to turn on your PC has risks of you getting electrocuted, just that the risk is so small, your gains of having it turned on to allow you to utilise it outweighs that of you dying from electrocution. Cannot see how any serious trader would agree to this statement.
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
Never resist the markets
Membre depuis Feb 15, 2017
posts 1
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:33
Membre depuis Aug 25, 2012
posts 35
Just another question, one that might seem a bit 'unorthodox':
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
I'm baffled by how the current trading results so far have reached well over +1000% ROI. Either some people here are finding ways to apply the 'law of very large numbers' which is legally dubious (in the context of contest rules) or they are genuinely a rare few who could be classified as 'supertraders'.
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
I'm baffled by how the current trading results so far have reached well over +1000% ROI. Either some people here are finding ways to apply the 'law of very large numbers' which is legally dubious (in the context of contest rules) or they are genuinely a rare few who could be classified as 'supertraders'.
- TimeWarp to 2030 AD -
Membre depuis Oct 28, 2015
posts 52
Membre depuis Oct 28, 2015
posts 52
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:34
(édité Feb 26, 2017 at 06:38)
Membre depuis May 08, 2010
posts 214
Just how a lot of Contestants managed over 1000% profits in just a couple weeks is really beyond me!.....Are you guys for real?...if so, I sure would like to try out your 'system' on a real live trading account and see whether it works the same way :)
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders😕
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders😕
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:40
Membre depuis Nov 22, 2016
posts 8
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
His thinking and sharing level would never match that of an average trader here.. let alone new traders..
Help the Poor!
Membre depuis Jan 08, 2016
posts 281
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:50
Membre depuis Jan 08, 2016
posts 281
jsoh85 posted:
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
We all do improve. Even by participation in a stupid Demo contest.... LOL
Also we all are having fun.
Isn't it real fun to se those up and downs ?!
😇
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
Membre depuis Jan 08, 2016
posts 281
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:51
Membre depuis Jan 08, 2016
posts 281
vocasla posted:
Just another question, one that might seem a bit 'unorthodox':
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
The pigeons will be disqualified using a shotgun by the broker. 😈 😈 😡
LOL
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:54
Membre depuis Sep 01, 2016
posts 13
Boferer posted:
Weinstein, please, could you answer one question?
Why do you even bother to trade in a contest with a 4000 USD prize when you have over 5000 % return on your real portfolio?
Plus, where in the screenshow can we see that its actually a real account and not a fake one?
thaTS A SILLY QUESTION, HE LIKES TO COMPETE, AND HE LIKES TO WIN, NOW ASK HIM A REAL ONE EH?
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:55
Membre depuis Sep 01, 2016
posts 13
vocasla posted:
Just another question, one that might seem a bit 'unorthodox':
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
I'm baffled by how the current trading results so far have reached well over +1000% ROI. Either some people here are finding ways to apply the 'law of very large numbers' which is legally dubious (in the context of contest rules) or they are genuinely a rare few who could be classified as 'supertraders'.
bWHAHAHA THE TRADES ARE PUBLIC! I entered late and thought I was doing ok, until I saw 1000% I only got like 7% a day two days trading int he contest, I guess I gotta step it up a notch?>
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:56
Membre depuis Sep 01, 2016
posts 13
jsoh85 posted:Weinstein posted:Croco_Dile posted:Weinstein posted:
IP tracking.
Gamblers in casino.
Trading is not a zero sum game.
There is no risk.
Weinstein, you really need a good avatar !
Don't be faceless.....
Good luck in trading ! Your live account looks really good ! 😎
Indeed.
Thank you!
IP tracking. - agree, although there are ways to mask it.
Gamblers in casino - agree, if you are not a professional card counter or poker player
Trading is not a zero sum game - agree, nothing to dispute
There is no risk. - Seriously? Even a decision to turn on your PC has risks of you getting electrocuted, just that the risk is so small, your gains of having it turned on to allow you to utilise it outweighs that of you dying from electrocution. Cannot see how any serious trader would agree to this statement.
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
um clue: probably better to examine his trades and learn something?> also please dont look at mine Im a master marker maker and I am just getting warmed up, I rule the markets and dunno if I wanna show all you all that, the banksters may hunt me down
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:57
Membre depuis Sep 01, 2016
posts 13
Boferer posted:
Weinstein, please, could you answer one question?
Why do you even bother to trade in a contest with a 4000 USD prize when you have over 5000 % return on your real portfolio?
Plus, where in the screenshow can we see that its actually a real account and not a fake one?
He broke his broker
Now they are broke
FInd another one
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 07:03
Membre depuis May 08, 2010
posts 214
Just how a lot of Contestants managed over 1000% profits in just a couple weeks is really beyond me!.....Are you guys for real?...if so, I sure would like to try out your 'system' on a real live trading account and see whether it works the same way :)
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders :p
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders :p
Feb 26, 2017 at 22:29
(édité Feb 26, 2017 at 22:48)
Membre depuis Apr 12, 2011
posts 12
jsoh85 posted:Weinstein posted:Croco_Dile posted:Weinstein posted:
IP tracking.
Gamblers in casino.
Trading is not a zero sum game.
There is no risk.
Weinstein, you really need a good avatar !
Don't be faceless.....
Good luck in trading ! Your live account looks really good ! 😎
Indeed.
Thank you!
IP tracking. - agree, although there are ways to mask it.
Gamblers in casino - agree, if you are not a professional card counter or poker player
Trading is not a zero sum game - agree, nothing to dispute
There is no risk. - Seriously? Even a decision to turn on your PC has risks of you getting electrocuted, just that the risk is so small, your gains of having it turned on to allow you to utilise it outweighs that of you dying from electrocution. Cannot see how any serious trader would agree to this statement.
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
Don't measure the detriment without considering the advantage.
Let's distinguish risk from VAR (value at risk).
Feb 26, 2017 at 22:31
Membre depuis Apr 12, 2011
posts 12
Boferer posted:
Weinstein, please, could you answer one question?
Why do you even bother to trade in a contest with a 4000 USD prize when you have over 5000 % return on your real portfolio?
Plus, where in the screenshow can we see that its actually a real account and not a fake one?
First there are three questions.
I will choose one, I do not bother.
*Lutilisation commerciale et le spam ne seront pas tolérés et peuvent entraîner la fermeture du compte.
Conseil : Poster une image/une url YouTube sera automatiquement intégrée dans votre message!
Conseil : Tapez le signe @ pour compléter automatiquement un nom dutilisateur participant à cette discussion.