- Accueil
- Communauté
- Général
- Anyone wanting to get rid of their losing EA, please contact...
Edit Your Comment
Anyone wanting to get rid of their losing EA, please contact me
forex_trader_113683
Membre depuis Feb 25, 2013
posts 5
Jul 10, 2013 at 19:16
Membre depuis Feb 25, 2013
posts 5
Greeting Traders,
I am looking for some losing EAs for my experiments and would very much appreciate if anyone is willing to give away their losing EA(s). I will consider paying you a price after I do some testing on it. Please contact me on kamkstrf AT g m a i l DOT c o m asap.
I am looking for some losing EAs for my experiments and would very much appreciate if anyone is willing to give away their losing EA(s). I will consider paying you a price after I do some testing on it. Please contact me on kamkstrf AT g m a i l DOT c o m asap.
Jul 12, 2013 at 05:46
Membre depuis Mar 01, 2013
posts 70
If you are researching the idea of trading the 'opposite' of a losing EA...I wish you the best. I have found that most EAs do not produce large enough pip losses to cover the spread when copying the opposite.
You win some, you lose some.
Membre depuis Nov 21, 2011
posts 1718
Jul 19, 2013 at 07:43
Membre depuis Nov 21, 2011
posts 1718
FXRX posted:
If you are researching the idea of trading the 'opposite' of a losing EA...I wish you the best. I have found that most EAs do not produce large enough pip losses to cover the spread when copying the opposite.
This is one of the best strategy on Forex.. But don't do it with a saclping EA otherwise with the spread you are indeed not making profit.
forex_trader_113683
Membre depuis Feb 25, 2013
posts 5
Jul 19, 2013 at 15:30
Membre depuis Feb 25, 2013
posts 5
Thank you all for your feedback, but the EAs that some of you mentioned are not exactly what I am looking for. Below is what I need and if anyone of you is kind of enough to help me out, I will make sure that you get some compensation later on:
1. EA should trade more often, not just once or twice a week or so.
2. EA should trade fixed lot and should lose at least 15 pips per trade. In other words, a scalper or a grid trading EA wouldn't do the job.
3. EA should trade more currency pairs, not just one or two pairs.
4. Losing trades should be considerably more than the winning trades, in other words 50-50 results would be useless.
Well that's pretty much it.
(Of course a winning EA is great but since they are not so easy to find, so I hope a losing EA with above mentioned points might be somewhere there.)
ONE MORE THING: We are also looking for SUCCESSFUL or NOT SUCCESSFULL traders who are looking to make some money on regular basis. In other words, if you can MAKE PIPS or LOSE PIPS, you can contact me.
The best thing would be contact me privately through this messaging system along with your contact details if you would like to talk about it.
1. EA should trade more often, not just once or twice a week or so.
2. EA should trade fixed lot and should lose at least 15 pips per trade. In other words, a scalper or a grid trading EA wouldn't do the job.
3. EA should trade more currency pairs, not just one or two pairs.
4. Losing trades should be considerably more than the winning trades, in other words 50-50 results would be useless.
Well that's pretty much it.
(Of course a winning EA is great but since they are not so easy to find, so I hope a losing EA with above mentioned points might be somewhere there.)
ONE MORE THING: We are also looking for SUCCESSFUL or NOT SUCCESSFULL traders who are looking to make some money on regular basis. In other words, if you can MAKE PIPS or LOSE PIPS, you can contact me.
The best thing would be contact me privately through this messaging system along with your contact details if you would like to talk about it.
Jul 20, 2013 at 03:05
(édité Jul 20, 2013 at 03:06)
Membre depuis Jul 17, 2012
posts 275
@kaks
Actually for the requirement 1 - 4, all of that have been tried by me last time. Tell you the truth, it is not good.
When I see an EA that create more loss than profit, I try reversing the logic but to the disappointment, the result pretty much the same, and usually it is even worst.
Not much we can gain here actually but I do wish all the best to you in seeking the positive result out of it. 😎
Actually for the requirement 1 - 4, all of that have been tried by me last time. Tell you the truth, it is not good.
When I see an EA that create more loss than profit, I try reversing the logic but to the disappointment, the result pretty much the same, and usually it is even worst.
Not much we can gain here actually but I do wish all the best to you in seeking the positive result out of it. 😎
Past experience usually helps present self
forex_trader_100532
Membre depuis Nov 24, 2012
posts 38
Jul 25, 2013 at 18:51
Membre depuis Nov 24, 2012
posts 38
deysmacro posted:
@kaks
Actually for the requirement 1 - 4, all of that have been tried by me last time. Tell you the truth, it is not good.
When I see an EA that create more loss than profit, I try reversing the logic but to the disappointment, the result pretty much the same, and usually it is even worst.
Not much we can gain here actually but I do wish all the best to you in seeking the positive result out of it. 😎
It's quite mysterious isn't it? I tried to reverse trading system to study more about my losses but the losses turn into another losses. I doubt trading forex is 50-50 chance really...
Jul 25, 2013 at 19:27
Membre depuis Mar 01, 2013
posts 70
Based on my EA research, most Forex trading with equal SL vs TP of 40 pips with 2 pip spread are 48% wins to 52% losses. This 1-2% difference between them is the spread. Of course, if the spread is 2 pips and the SL and TP are say 10 pips, then the spread percentage impact will be more severe. That is why some say the 'house' always wins also applies to Forex.
You win some, you lose some.
*Lutilisation commerciale et le spam ne seront pas tolérés et peuvent entraîner la fermeture du compte.
Conseil : Poster une image/une url YouTube sera automatiquement intégrée dans votre message!
Conseil : Tapez le signe @ pour compléter automatiquement un nom dutilisateur participant à cette discussion.