FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com (de NickMcDonald)
Lutilisateur a supprimé ce système.
Edit Your Comment
Discussion FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com
Membre depuis Jan 25, 2010
posts 1360
Jun 17, 2013 at 06:31
Membre depuis Jan 25, 2010
posts 1360
Please provide a subscription link somewhere! I don't know how I subscribed before, but I can't seem to resubscribe!
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010
posts 123
Membre depuis Oct 27, 2011
posts 86
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
Membre depuis Oct 27, 2011
posts 86
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
Jul 16, 2013 at 19:49
Membre depuis Nov 07, 2012
posts 85
Aplmustdie posted:
Another wonderful trade . . .
If this trade doesn't win I think I'll stop until new high water mark. Then I can have trust in the trader again.
5-15pip TP with 50+ SL can be 10:1 r/r and that can take a long time to recover if ever.😞
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
Jul 23, 2013 at 17:21
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
uk_max posted:
shouldn't the drawdown be about 50% and not 25%?
Your account had almost 100% gain ( $8,000 profit ) and now its near 50% gain. Only shows a 25% loss in the month of July while you missed out on 4k profit banked profit 😳
Drawdown is based on the size of the entire account, not just the profits.
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010
posts 123
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010
posts 123
Membre depuis Jul 05, 2011
posts 305
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:27
Membre depuis Aug 07, 2013
posts 23
Guys,
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010
posts 123
*Lutilisation commerciale et le spam ne seront pas tolérés et peuvent entraîner la fermeture du compte.
Conseil : Poster une image/une url YouTube sera automatiquement intégrée dans votre message!
Conseil : Tapez le signe @ pour compléter automatiquement un nom dutilisateur participant à cette discussion.