Show your profitable account here.
May 27, 2016 at 20:27
Abs Gain is a gain determinated on the whole deposit.
If i start to increasing my deposit every month is obvious the 'abs gain' will decrease.
It's an elementary thing. Really i have to explain this?
If now i deposit other 200k The abs gain will be 0.139%.
That doesn't matter. Because the 3.41% is real is what i made with a certain deposit that month every month and made a total gain of 3.41%.
I dare you to try to made 1-3% per month without using the leverage but only with your own money. The gain is the last factor to see in my opinion.
But i'm not here to concern other strategies. Have a good trading all.
If i start to increasing my deposit every month is obvious the 'abs gain' will decrease.
It's an elementary thing. Really i have to explain this?
If now i deposit other 200k The abs gain will be 0.139%.
That doesn't matter. Because the 3.41% is real is what i made with a certain deposit that month every month and made a total gain of 3.41%.
I dare you to try to made 1-3% per month without using the leverage but only with your own money. The gain is the last factor to see in my opinion.
But i'm not here to concern other strategies. Have a good trading all.
Change your mind , change your life , change your world.
May 27, 2016 at 20:27
Abs Gain is a gain determinated on the whole deposit.
If i start to increasing my deposit every month is obvious the 'abs gain' will decrease.
It's an elementary thing. Really i have to explain this?
If now i deposit other 200k The abs gain will be 0.139%.
That doesn't matter. Because the 3.41% is real is what i made with a certain deposit that month every month and made a total gain of 3.41%.
I dare you to try to made 1-3% per month without using the leverage but only with your own money. The gain is the last factor to see in my opinion.
But i'm not here to concern other strategies. Have a good trading all.
If i start to increasing my deposit every month is obvious the 'abs gain' will decrease.
It's an elementary thing. Really i have to explain this?
If now i deposit other 200k The abs gain will be 0.139%.
That doesn't matter. Because the 3.41% is real is what i made with a certain deposit that month every month and made a total gain of 3.41%.
I dare you to try to made 1-3% per month without using the leverage but only with your own money. The gain is the last factor to see in my opinion.
But i'm not here to concern other strategies. Have a good trading all.
Change your mind , change your life , change your world.
May 27, 2016 at 20:37
I am not criticizing, just put the data, the real gain is 1.39%, if my intention was to criticize, I would say that a gain of 6% a year in a market risk, is ridiculous, there are safer investments, if your looking a return like that.
Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.
May 27, 2016 at 20:43
neoxis posted:
Abs Gain is a gain determinated on the whole deposit.
If i start to increasing my deposit every month is obvious the 'abs gain' will decrease.
It's an elementary thing. Really i have to explain this?
If now i deposit other 200k The abs gain will be 0.139%.
That doesn't matter. Because the 3.41% is real is what i made with a certain deposit that month every month and made a total gain of 3.41%.
I dare you to try to made 1-3% per month without using the leverage but only with your own money. The gain is the last factor to see in my opinion.
But i'm not here to concern other strategies. Have a good trading all.
You do not have to explain anything, I fully understand the meaning of abs gain, it is reality, so simple, if I deposit 1k and if I go wrong, I deposit 10k more, and then 50k but the reality of what achievement will remain the abs gain.
this in your stats, if you are angry, do it with statistics, I just put the cold data
Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.
May 27, 2016 at 21:13
deposit more cause I been wrong? Where did i something wrong? You don't know what you are saying. I will continue to deposit more step by step cause I want a bigger a account to show that's it. Nothing wrong as you can see the trading and the equity is totally clean. I'm not here to sell anything. I do trading with my own money and this is what I want to show to potentials investors. Quality trading without pushing leverage. If you think a good account is who has the higher % Gain is just a waste of time talking. Stability and safety are my priority always. Who is interested in high gain can continues to waste time on demo , cent , martingale account with a lavarage abuse.
Change your mind , change your life , change your world.
May 27, 2016 at 21:30
neoxis posted:
deposit more cause I been wrong? Where did i something wrong? You don't know what you are saying. I will continue to deposit more step by step cause I want a bigger a account to show that's it. Nothing wrong as you can see the trading and the equity is totally clean. I'm not here to sell anything. I do trading with my own money and this is what I want to show to potentials investors. Quality trading without pushing leverage. If you think a good account is who has the higher % Gain is just a waste of time talking. Stability and safety are my priority always. Who is interested in high gain can continues to waste time on demo , cent , martingale account with a lavarage abuse.
obviously we do not speak of the same thing, again I'm not criticizing, but the data are the data, in an investment, you must assess the risk and benefit, if I put my money in a bank, the bank gives me 7% annual interest, no one can argue with that is safer to invest in this market, this is a forum and arguments are discussed, no personal positions are discussed, for you the abs does not matter, and the balance between risk and the benefit either, and you have every right to have your ideas.
Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.
會員從Dec 30, 2013開始
7帖子
May 28, 2016 at 14:00
5starsignalspamm posted:FXtrader2010 posted:5starsignalspamm posted:none. Either set private or have less than 10k balance
What percentage of accounts posted do you think meet the specs on page one here?
The criteria :
1) The account must be real - no demo's. (please do not argue here that it is the same as a live acc. etc - the idea is not to engage in any arguments)
2) The account must be verified (please do not come and defend your unverified-but-want-to-participate account - there will simply be no interest)
3)DD must not be higher than 40% - (please. Once again. No justification for your above 40% dd, if it is higher - don't participate)
4)The account must be older than 3 months, maybe this is even still too young.
5)No martingales! (it might work for you, and I do not want to engage in an argument - just please keep to yourself and don't participate)
I don't see anything mentioning $10K or the fact balance/equity needs to be disclosed.
Nor so I see that variable as extremely important, to be honest.
hey 5 star signals pamm. i like your name. 5 star, signals, pamm. exactly what i do. i've done 5 star signals, i've done pamms worth $400,000, and i've shut them down and lost more money than you could ever lose because i failed. but that amount of failure is only an advantage.
if you want me to trade any random demo or demonstrate my trading live. let me know.
but dont discount a demo account. guys that are really making it in this racket dont even post thier accounts.
Focus on how much you could lose. Not how much you can make.
會員從Dec 30, 2013開始
7帖子
May 28, 2016 at 14:00
And sorry for posting demos on this thread everyone. i didn't read the first thread.
Focus on how much you could lose. Not how much you can make.
forex_trader_201100
會員從Jul 25, 2014開始
184帖子
May 28, 2016 at 19:04
jeremyreid posted:5starsignalspamm posted:FXtrader2010 posted:5starsignalspamm posted:none. Either set private or have less than 10k balance
What percentage of accounts posted do you think meet the specs on page one here?
The criteria :
1) The account must be real - no demo's. (please do not argue here that it is the same as a live acc. etc - the idea is not to engage in any arguments)
2) The account must be verified (please do not come and defend your unverified-but-want-to-participate account - there will simply be no interest)
3)DD must not be higher than 40% - (please. Once again. No justification for your above 40% dd, if it is higher - don't participate)
4)The account must be older than 3 months, maybe this is even still too young.
5)No martingales! (it might work for you, and I do not want to engage in an argument - just please keep to yourself and don't participate)
I don't see anything mentioning $10K or the fact balance/equity needs to be disclosed.
Nor so I see that variable as extremely important, to be honest.
hey 5 star signals pamm. i like your name. 5 star, signals, pamm. exactly what i do. i've done 5 star signals, i've done pamms worth $400,000, and i've shut them down and lost more money than you could ever lose because i failed. but that amount of failure is only an advantage.
if you want me to trade any random demo or demonstrate my trading live. let me know.
but dont discount a demo account. guys that are really making it in this racket dont even post thier accounts.
Hi,
We do source new traders however we need live history and also it seems like you are using some sort of grid system with large deviations in the balance and equity, these are not suitable for the sustainable forms of money management we aim to provide.
I wish you all the best though.
會員從May 20, 2011開始
724帖子
May 29, 2016 at 09:55
lluna10 posted:
hey i recently posted my account in here and i want to stop receiving updates what do i do?
附件:
forex_trader_201100
會員從Jul 25, 2014開始
184帖子
May 29, 2016 at 17:08
(已編輯May 29, 2016 at 17:11)
fxinvesta posted:
I am not criticizing, just put the data, the real gain is 1.39%, if my intention was to criticize, I would say that a gain of 6% a year in a market risk, is ridiculous, there are safer investments, if your looking a return like that.
I personally think the TWR is the variable to track otherwise cash ins and cash outs skew the PL.
We do PAMMs so tracking abs gains is redundant.
We trade selectively and may not trade for a few weeks or a month.
If we do that and we bring in new investment in that time, our abs gain drops through the time we are flat.
So we can sit aside and wait for the better opportunities for a month and be in a draw down in abs gain.
In fact, a successful PAMM is likely to downtrend in abs gain as it attracts new investments.
The abs gain give absolutely no indication of the net profitability of the accounts.
To call the abs gain the 'real gain' would be non reflective.
For a simple example, if there was $2,000 in and it made 100%, there is $4,000 with $2,000 profit.
The system looks good, more money is thrown in.
Let's say $100,000 goes in, the abs gain is now 1%, even though over the time period before this any money in the account will have doubled.
Lets say this was over a year, we have a gain of about 8% a month on this system and for that a DD of 15-20% would be good.
Working on abs gain, the DD is 200x more than the average monthly gain, which is horrific and not fit for investment.
But on the TWR, the real gain, it is 1:3 ratio and statistically unlikely to lose 2 quarters in a years, very good looking investment.
So from a money manager/investor perspective, abs gains are totally pointless as a metric to track.
forex_trader_201100
會員從Jul 25, 2014開始
184帖子
May 29, 2016 at 17:13
^ Which is probably why Myfxbook show the geometric monthly average as TWR
May 29, 2016 at 17:25
5starsignalspamm posted:fxinvesta posted:
I am not criticizing, just put the data, the real gain is 1.39%, if my intention was to criticize, I would say that a gain of 6% a year in a market risk, is ridiculous, there are safer investments, if your looking a return like that.
I personally think the TWR is the variable to track otherwise cash ins and cash outs skew the PL.
We do PAMMs so tracking abs gains is redundant.
We trade selectively and may not trade for a few weeks or a month.
If we do that and we bring in new investment in that time, our abs gain drops through the time we are flat.
So we can sit aside and wait for the better opportunities for a month and be in a draw down in abs gain.
In fact, a successful PAMM is likely to downtrend in abs gain as it attracts new investments.
The abs gain give absolutely no indication of the net profitability of the accounts.
To call the abs gain the 'real gain' would be non reflective.
For a simple example, if there was $2,000 in and it made 100%, there is $4,000 with $2,000 profit.
The system looks good, more money is thrown in.
Let's say $100,000 goes in, the abs gain is now 1%, even though over the time period before this any money in the account will have doubled.
Lets say this was over a year, we have a gain of about 8% a month on this system and for that a DD of 15-20% would be good.
Working on abs gain, the DD is 200x more than the average monthly gain, which is horrific and not fit for investment.
But on the TWR, the real gain, it is 1:3 ratio and statistically unlikely to lose 2 quarters in a years, very good looking investment.
So from a money manager/investor perspective, abs gains are totally pointless as a metric to track.
Is what i'm trying to say...What you made in every month that's the real gain. If i have a pamm or i want to deposit every month more money do not have any effect on the total gain generated.
If i have an investor and he deposit 1k the first month and i generate 2% gain and the next month he deposit 1k again total 2k the abs gain it would be 1% and not anymore 2%. So there is no reason to watch that.
But it seems people in here don't know how to watch signals.
Change your mind , change your life , change your world.
forex_trader_201100
會員從Jul 25, 2014開始
184帖子
May 29, 2016 at 17:39
(已編輯May 29, 2016 at 17:40)
neoxis posted:5starsignalspamm posted:fxinvesta posted:
I am not criticizing, just put the data, the real gain is 1.39%, if my intention was to criticize, I would say that a gain of 6% a year in a market risk, is ridiculous, there are safer investments, if your looking a return like that.
I personally think the TWR is the variable to track otherwise cash ins and cash outs skew the PL.
We do PAMMs so tracking abs gains is redundant.
We trade selectively and may not trade for a few weeks or a month.
If we do that and we bring in new investment in that time, our abs gain drops through the time we are flat.
So we can sit aside and wait for the better opportunities for a month and be in a draw down in abs gain.
In fact, a successful PAMM is likely to downtrend in abs gain as it attracts new investments.
The abs gain give absolutely no indication of the net profitability of the accounts.
To call the abs gain the 'real gain' would be non reflective.
For a simple example, if there was $2,000 in and it made 100%, there is $4,000 with $2,000 profit.
The system looks good, more money is thrown in.
Let's say $100,000 goes in, the abs gain is now 1%, even though over the time period before this any money in the account will have doubled.
Lets say this was over a year, we have a gain of about 8% a month on this system and for that a DD of 15-20% would be good.
Working on abs gain, the DD is 200x more than the average monthly gain, which is horrific and not fit for investment.
But on the TWR, the real gain, it is 1:3 ratio and statistically unlikely to lose 2 quarters in a years, very good looking investment.
So from a money manager/investor perspective, abs gains are totally pointless as a metric to track.
Is what i'm trying to say...What you made in every month that's the real gain. If i have a pamm or i want to deposit every month more money do not have any effect on the total gain generated.
If i have an investor and he deposit 1k the first month and i generate 2% gain and the next month he deposit 1k again total 2k the abs gain it would be 1% and not anymore 2%. So there is no reason to watch that.
But it seems people in here don't know how to watch signals.
Yea on a risk:return assessment, abs gain is useless.
Only the TWR can be used when there is the potential for further investment, be that personal or added from other parties.
May 29, 2016 at 17:41
5starsignalspamm posted:fxinvesta posted:
I am not criticizing, just put the data, the real gain is 1.39%, if my intention was to criticize, I would say that a gain of 6% a year in a market risk, is ridiculous, there are safer investments, if your looking a return like that.
I personally think the TWR is the variable to track otherwise cash ins and cash outs skew the PL.
We do PAMMs so tracking abs gains is redundant.
We trade selectively and may not trade for a few weeks or a month.
If we do that and we bring in new investment in that time, our abs gain drops through the time we are flat.
So we can sit aside and wait for the better opportunities for a month and be in a draw down in abs gain.
In fact, a successful PAMM is likely to downtrend in abs gain as it attracts new investments.
The abs gain give absolutely no indication of the net profitability of the accounts.
To call the abs gain the 'real gain' would be non reflective.
For a simple example, if there was $2,000 in and it made 100%, there is $4,000 with $2,000 profit.
The system looks good, more money is thrown in.
Let's say $100,000 goes in, the abs gain is now 1%, even though over the time period before this any money in the account will have doubled.
Lets say this was over a year, we have a gain of about 8% a month on this system and for that a DD of 15-20% would be good.
Working on abs gain, the DD is 200x more than the average monthly gain, which is horrific and not fit for investment.
But on the TWR, the real gain, it is 1:3 ratio and statistically unlikely to lose 2 quarters in a years, very good looking investment.
So from a money manager/investor perspective, abs gains are totally pointless as a metric to track.
oK very well all, but I can not know if you increase your investors, or you're raising money because your operations need ... and as here the game is between followed and followers, (A game that I do not, for being absurd), the abs gain is essential because, or, you increase each time the trader can increase it or lose all your capital in a moment
Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.
forex_trader_201100
會員從Jul 25, 2014開始
184帖子
May 29, 2016 at 17:42
fxinvesta posted:5starsignalspamm posted:fxinvesta posted:
I am not criticizing, just put the data, the real gain is 1.39%, if my intention was to criticize, I would say that a gain of 6% a year in a market risk, is ridiculous, there are safer investments, if your looking a return like that.
I personally think the TWR is the variable to track otherwise cash ins and cash outs skew the PL.
We do PAMMs so tracking abs gains is redundant.
We trade selectively and may not trade for a few weeks or a month.
If we do that and we bring in new investment in that time, our abs gain drops through the time we are flat.
So we can sit aside and wait for the better opportunities for a month and be in a draw down in abs gain.
In fact, a successful PAMM is likely to downtrend in abs gain as it attracts new investments.
The abs gain give absolutely no indication of the net profitability of the accounts.
To call the abs gain the 'real gain' would be non reflective.
Yes, you can. Deviation in the abs gain and TWR indicates cash ins or outs.
If you know how to read the stats it is very plan to see.
forex_trader_201100
會員從Jul 25, 2014開始
184帖子
May 29, 2016 at 17:43
(已編輯May 29, 2016 at 17:45)
Things that affect the ratio of abs gain vrs TWR do not in any way affect the max DD stats (or even average) so the risk can be assessed in the same manner as any other time.
forex_trader_201100
會員從Jul 25, 2014開始
184帖子
May 29, 2016 at 17:50
(已編輯May 29, 2016 at 17:50)
the abs gain is essential because, or, you increase each time the trader can increase it or lose all your capital in a moment
In regards to this, this is a money management issue rather than anything else.
If a set method of risk is used or set rules for max risk as a percentage of equity then there is no effect by new investment coming in.
Lot sizes scale along with the investment capital.
If someone was trading profitable for a year and then was to blow up in a day, the abs gain would give you no red flags of this at all.
It is not a functional metric really.
