Edit Your Comment
Prove your trading worth... 100% weekly on a consistent basis - long-term?
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
Feb 02, 2015 at 10:17
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
BluePanther posted:
@CrazyTrader Nice comparisons with the Equity/Growth charts... you raise a good point in a very illustrative manner.
Thx.
I suggest like Bob already said to ignore this 'Cholipop'... He is an old troller used to be name such as M.K.
Dear M.K. I told you you could create other username, but you would be roten very quickly... you are the only one talking about Pip-Drawdown.
If no one respond to him... he will feel alone : )
Feb 02, 2015 at 15:54
Dec 12, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물110
Cholipop posted:CrazyTrader posted:BluePanther posted:
@CrazyTrader Nice comparisons with the Equity/Growth charts... you raise a good point in a very illustrative manner.
Thx.
I suggest like Bob already said to ignore this 'Cholipop'... He is an old troller used to be name such as M.K.
Dear M.K. I told you you could create other username, but you would be roten very quickly... you are the only one talking about Pip-Drawdown.
If no one respond to him... he will feel alone : )
You can ignore me, but you can't ignore the stats.
The funny thing is he has 0 stop loss. With a tp of over 250 pips which means he has R:R of ALLOFHISACCOUNT:250 but his nzd/usd trade he closed for a negative 80 pip loss, but EU is well over that amount.
Also , current 1 lot trade is 10x amount of previous trades. considering the account took a dive, it should be called a pure gamble.
Its not my money so better place some bet.
Last pathethic attempt to keep mask of expert trader, whilie talking on all forums simultaneously.
Cool :)
Get investors and get paid 15 percent of theyr profits. More on my website.
Jun 28, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물465
Feb 03, 2015 at 03:13
Jun 28, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물465
Hey, CrazyTrader... Thanks for the help, I think it's working.
You know, I had to stop putting my research work out so everyone could see it because everyone that comes on here thinks that whatever we are currently working on is what we have been trading for our income. Its a natural mistake but it make for crazy questions and turns into a constant mess.
The Chance of my Life has lost the jaggedness now, you just have to get the other paramiters lined up. It looks pretty close though. I would still make it private until you get a chance to tweek it. You know it could be something as simple as droping a negitive sign in the program algo.
Bob
You know, I had to stop putting my research work out so everyone could see it because everyone that comes on here thinks that whatever we are currently working on is what we have been trading for our income. Its a natural mistake but it make for crazy questions and turns into a constant mess.
The Chance of my Life has lost the jaggedness now, you just have to get the other paramiters lined up. It looks pretty close though. I would still make it private until you get a chance to tweek it. You know it could be something as simple as droping a negitive sign in the program algo.
Bob
where research touches lives.
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
Feb 03, 2015 at 05:09
(편집됨 Feb 03, 2015 at 05:36)
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
@Cholipop : Your posts belong in the Discussion thread of that account. Please read the topic of this thread. 😡
@mavericks : Your posts belong in the Discussion thread of that account. Please read the topic of this thread. 😡
@ForexAssistant: Thank you for your contribution. However 1.9% per month does not meet the definition of 'phenomenal' returns. 😞
@DrVodka: Thank you for your contribution. Let us see you continue your stellar performance and prove the critics wrong in twelve months' time. 😉
@trot: Thank you for your contribution. That system looks to have potential, but again the historical performance is lacking. Let us hope to see such performance sustained for the next twelve months. 😉
***********************************************************************************************
Seems Coliseum's post (page 3) is the closest anyone is to achieving 'phenomenal' returns long-term here. Still, falls well-short of the thread's expectations... but looks promising nonetheless.
Maybe this will be our winner (in twelve months' time)?
@mavericks : Your posts belong in the Discussion thread of that account. Please read the topic of this thread. 😡
@ForexAssistant: Thank you for your contribution. However 1.9% per month does not meet the definition of 'phenomenal' returns. 😞
@DrVodka: Thank you for your contribution. Let us see you continue your stellar performance and prove the critics wrong in twelve months' time. 😉
@trot: Thank you for your contribution. That system looks to have potential, but again the historical performance is lacking. Let us hope to see such performance sustained for the next twelve months. 😉
***********************************************************************************************
Seems Coliseum's post (page 3) is the closest anyone is to achieving 'phenomenal' returns long-term here. Still, falls well-short of the thread's expectations... but looks promising nonetheless.
Maybe this will be our winner (in twelve months' time)?
ColiseumFX posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/files/ColiseumFX/trading129.png
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
Feb 03, 2015 at 07:27
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
BluePanther posted:
***********************************************************************************************
Seems Coliseum's post (page 3) is the closest anyone is to achieving 'phenomenal' returns long-term here. Still, falls well-short of the thread's expectations... but looks promising nonetheless.
Maybe this will be our winner (in twelve months' time)?ColiseumFX posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/files/ColiseumFX/trading129.png
Hang on a bit... I'm recovering : )
Good luck to all
Feb 03, 2015 at 15:56
Feb 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물4862
BluePanther posted:@BluePanther
@Cholipop : Your posts belong in the Discussion thread of that account. Please read the topic of this thread. 😡
@mavericks : Your posts belong in the Discussion thread of that account. Please read the topic of this thread. 😡
@ForexAssistant: Thank you for your contribution. However 1.9% per month does not meet the definition of 'phenomenal' returns. 😞
@DrVodka: Thank you for your contribution. Let us see you continue your stellar performance and prove the critics wrong in twelve months' time. 😉
@trot: Thank you for your contribution. That system looks to have potential, but again the historical performance is lacking. Let us hope to see such performance sustained for the next twelve months. 😉
***********************************************************************************************
Seems Coliseum's post (page 3) is the closest anyone is to achieving 'phenomenal' returns long-term here. Still, falls well-short of the thread's expectations... but looks promising nonetheless.
Maybe this will be our winner (in twelve months' time)?ColiseumFX posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/files/ColiseumFX/trading129.png
Coliseum account is stable and profitable. But is is far away from 100%/we or 100%/mo
It has about 8%/mo. I consider it great system. DD could be lower but it is still good.
On the other hand if this is the best user you found it implies that there is no such system with so high profit for long term.
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
Feb 03, 2015 at 22:21
(편집됨 Feb 03, 2015 at 22:22)
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
Cholipop posted:
Hey Mav... What do you think about crazytrader..... He has the nerve to be blogging, when his clients account is taking a big time pounding.
Hey Ethan... What do you think about Cholipops..... He has the nerve to continue posting irrelevant garbage in my thread, despite repeated efforts to explain to him what this thread is supposed to be about.
@Cholipop: Your posts belong in the Discussion thread of that system. I am repeating myself because you persist in irrelevant postings.
Dec 04, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1557
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
Feb 03, 2015 at 23:56
(편집됨 Feb 04, 2015 at 00:05)
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
aeronthomas posted:
As an owner of a thread you should be able to delete irrelevant crap from persistent annoying posters who are off topic just like you can delete comments on your own Facebook page.
If only it were that simple. Myfxbook does not have that feature available to thread starters - I can only 'Report' offending posts and await Support's response in removing them. Ha! Oh well... 😀
Anyways... back to topic! Anyone else got a system that may prove the critics wrong? Any potential candidates (systems) are encouraged! 😉
togr posted:
@BluePanther
Coliseum account is stable and profitable. But is is far away from 100%/we or 100%/mo
It has about 8%/mo. I consider it great system. DD could be lower but it is still good.
On the other hand if this is the best user you found it implies that there is no such system with so high profit for long term.
So far that is the best system posted in this thread. 'If it ain't here, it don't exist!' ie. perhaps there is no better system out there...? Nah (surely there is)! 😉
But this thread is in response to the thread 'Is it possible to turn $100 into $1000 in four weeks? (real money)'. Because surely that is possible (as has been proven time and again in that thread), but is that same concept possible LONG-TERM?
That is what I would like an answer to here. 😎
(most folks don't believe it possible - I reluctantly agree, but still I must ask the question to prove this)
Feb 04, 2015 at 00:27
Dec 16, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물297
u can just BAN them 😉.That way they wont be able to post in your topics .Ever 😇
back to the topic
Im sorry Mat but its like asking - can someone print the money ?? Yes they can !!!
Do they what to show it to you and the rest world how to do it . I dot think so .😎
good luck in your quest
back to the topic
Im sorry Mat but its like asking - can someone print the money ?? Yes they can !!!
Do they what to show it to you and the rest world how to do it . I dot think so .😎
good luck in your quest
Jun 28, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물465
Feb 04, 2015 at 01:17
Jun 28, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물465
First a comment on the idea of banning someone, trolls included or deleting their post is wrong and more offensive than the crap that you have to wade through from the trolls. I would leave the forum if they started doing that. It's far better to teach respect than to limit freedoms because that puts one person in authority over their fellow human, and that is the very definition of evil.
Now, Matt claims that I don't have a right to speak because my systems don't generate 100% a month but that is because he has limiting ideas that he didn't include. Let's think outside the box and see if we can make 100% a month with my systems. There are 7 billion people on the planet, so my solution would have to suit others - not just me, so I will have to use numbers that anyone can achieve.
Here is my solution then. If someone is working in some dusty mill or any job that they don't like, they would want to replace their income with a passive income like my robots do, right? Now if any of my students tell one of their friends how there is a super safe system that they could use to retire with, I pay that referring student $200. Their cost to be my student is $800. So the risk is $800, and to make 100% profit would require 4 referrals a month. Shouldn't be much of a problem for a hands off investment system that doesn't lose very often.
You may not like my solution but it fits the stupid premise. The best way to get high returns is in the stock market where shares can sell for a buck. Limited losses, this is good, unlimited gain potential, this is even better. And it's easy for a stock to go from one to two dollars making a 100% profit. But here's something that's important that makes this whole thread off topic – and that is, the larger the balance the more difficult it is to get higher percentages. If you start dealing in millions, there just isn't a program out there that can do much better than ten percent.
Anyway, that's my two cents worth … Bob
Now, Matt claims that I don't have a right to speak because my systems don't generate 100% a month but that is because he has limiting ideas that he didn't include. Let's think outside the box and see if we can make 100% a month with my systems. There are 7 billion people on the planet, so my solution would have to suit others - not just me, so I will have to use numbers that anyone can achieve.
Here is my solution then. If someone is working in some dusty mill or any job that they don't like, they would want to replace their income with a passive income like my robots do, right? Now if any of my students tell one of their friends how there is a super safe system that they could use to retire with, I pay that referring student $200. Their cost to be my student is $800. So the risk is $800, and to make 100% profit would require 4 referrals a month. Shouldn't be much of a problem for a hands off investment system that doesn't lose very often.
You may not like my solution but it fits the stupid premise. The best way to get high returns is in the stock market where shares can sell for a buck. Limited losses, this is good, unlimited gain potential, this is even better. And it's easy for a stock to go from one to two dollars making a 100% profit. But here's something that's important that makes this whole thread off topic – and that is, the larger the balance the more difficult it is to get higher percentages. If you start dealing in millions, there just isn't a program out there that can do much better than ten percent.
Anyway, that's my two cents worth … Bob
where research touches lives.
Dec 04, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1557
Feb 04, 2015 at 04:32
Dec 04, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1557
ForexAssistant posted:
First a comment on the idea of banning someone, trolls included or deleting their post is wrong and more offensive than the crap that you have to wade through from the trolls. I would leave the forum if they started doing that. It's far better to teach respect than to limit freedoms because that puts one person in authority over their fellow human, and that is the very definition of evil.
Now, Matt claims that I don't have a right to speak because my systems don't generate 100% a month but that is because he has limiting ideas that he didn't include. Let's think outside the box and see if we can make 100% a month with my systems. There are 7 billion people on the planet, so my solution would have to suit others - not just me, so I will have to use numbers that anyone can achieve.
Here is my solution then. If someone is working in some dusty mill or any job that they don't like, they would want to replace their income with a passive income like my robots do, right? Now if any of my students tell one of their friends how there is a super safe system that they could use to retire with, I pay that referring student $200. Their cost to be my student is $800. So the risk is $800, and to make 100% profit would require 4 referrals a month. Shouldn't be much of a problem for a hands off investment system that doesn't lose very often.
You may not like my solution but it fits the stupid premise. The best way to get high returns is in the stock market where shares can sell for a buck. Limited losses, this is good, unlimited gain potential, this is even better. And it's easy for a stock to go from one to two dollars making a 100% profit. But here's something that's important that makes this whole thread off topic – and that is, the larger the balance the more difficult it is to get higher percentages. If you start dealing in millions, there just isn't a program out there that can do much better than ten percent.
Anyway, that's my two cents worth … Bob
I disagree if you can't stay on topic as requested several times by the thread starter and you are just stirring up trouble and insulting others contributing to the thread, you deserve to be banned from the thread not the forum itself, although some scammers who lurk on this site should be banned from both. (this isn't directed at you Bob, nor was my original comment by the way). Otherwise yes it just wastes everyone's time, and time is a previous commodity in this modern world not worth wasting...
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
Feb 04, 2015 at 04:52
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
DrVodka posted:
u can just BAN them 😉.That way they wont be able to post in your topics .Ever 😇
back to the topic
Im sorry Mat but its like asking - can someone print the money ?? Yes they can !!!
Do they what to show it to you and the rest world how to do it . I dot think so .😎
good luck in your quest
Yes, I understand that. My opinion: If it ain't here, it doesn't exist! Though I'm sure this thread (or similar) will be around long after I am gone...
Many can prove 'yes, it is possible to turn $100 into $1000 in four weeks', but let's see them prove the same for twelve months. 😉
Feb 04, 2015 at 10:49
Feb 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물4862
ForexAssistant posted:@ForexAssistant
First a comment on the idea of banning someone, trolls included or deleting their post is wrong and more offensive than the crap that you have to wade through from the trolls. I would leave the forum if they started doing that. It's far better to teach respect than to limit freedoms because that puts one person in authority over their fellow human, and that is the very definition of evil.
Now, Matt claims that I don't have a right to speak because my systems don't generate 100% a month but that is because he has limiting ideas that he didn't include. Let's think outside the box and see if we can make 100% a month with my systems. There are 7 billion people on the planet, so my solution would have to suit others - not just me, so I will have to use numbers that anyone can achieve.
Here is my solution then. If someone is working in some dusty mill or any job that they don't like, they would want to replace their income with a passive income like my robots do, right? Now if any of my students tell one of their friends how there is a super safe system that they could use to retire with, I pay that referring student $200. Their cost to be my student is $800. So the risk is $800, and to make 100% profit would require 4 referrals a month. Shouldn't be much of a problem for a hands off investment system that doesn't lose very often.
You may not like my solution but it fits the stupid premise. The best way to get high returns is in the stock market where shares can sell for a buck. Limited losses, this is good, unlimited gain potential, this is even better. And it's easy for a stock to go from one to two dollars making a 100% profit. But here's something that's important that makes this whole thread off topic – and that is, the larger the balance the more difficult it is to get higher percentages. If you start dealing in millions, there just isn't a program out there that can do much better than ten percent.
Anyway, that's my two cents worth … Bob
Hi Bob,
with all the respect to you I disagree.
Such trolls are able to kill any discussion by their useless comments. Unfortunately the only way to prevent this on MFB is to block the user. The discussion on other sites have their moderators too and it is good practice which helps to keep the topic usefull.
Basically any off topic discussion should have been removed. So this comment belongs to topic Trolls and Idiots on MFB. I do not name anyone not even Chollipop.
Apr 22, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물45
Feb 11, 2015 at 07:40
Apr 22, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물45
BluePanther posted:
Prove your trading worth...
Are you achieving MINIMUM 100% per month on a consistent, long-term basis (over twelve months)? Or do you consistently make 10% per day, or 100% a week?
Boast about your results here. You need to provide a myfxbook REAL MONEY account page which can help prove your trading prowess is LEGITIMATE! It is optional if you also share your trading technique, helpful advice, EAs, etc. but this is encouraged to help prove the legitimacy of your abilities and history.
Of course, the higher your returns (on a long-term and consistent basis), the better your bragging rights!
Let the bragging begin!
(I hardly expect many can meet this challenge, but I would not be surprised if a few can truly prove themselves!)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE ABIDE BY MYFXBOOK CONDITIONS OF POSTING:
Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
If you post in this thread, do not attempt to sell anything. Sharing information is encouraged but be wary of appearing to solicit for commercial purposes!
nice post brother, very inspiring people
100% a week is very easy, someone can make it 100% - 1000% a day but for consistently i think is not easy and really need too much effort.
i try it last trading week with gain 103% and highest DD 8% (proof here: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bungtobing/100/1152192), its really hard using low risk management to get high profit.
hope i can make it consistently on long-term basis (over twelve months). wish me luck brother 😉
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
Feb 11, 2015 at 08:38
(편집됨 Feb 11, 2015 at 08:38)
Jan 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1360
@togr : Agreed. Thank you for being one of the 'sane' contributors to this (and other) threads. 😄
@bungtobing : Thank you kindly for your contribution. I appreciate some traders make efforts to achieve these sort of returns (even if these sort of returns are a definite 'stretch' of trading reality). It pleases me to know the purpose of this thread is not lost on some people... Best of luck! 😎
@bungtobing : Thank you kindly for your contribution. I appreciate some traders make efforts to achieve these sort of returns (even if these sort of returns are a definite 'stretch' of trading reality). It pleases me to know the purpose of this thread is not lost on some people... Best of luck! 😎
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.