My dilemma
forex_trader_139412
Jul 16, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물385
Nov 23, 2015 at 14:56
As I have pointed out in another thread (which blocked me)
I have stopped pursuing this as it only looked good, trading without stops. Once or twice a bad trade was taken, a worse trade than 10 year backtests revealed, and because there was no stop it just carried on going south until hitting mc or being closed manually..
I wish someone had pointed out to me then that 'straight line' EAs look good, but eventually bites you in the backside..
I have stopped pursuing this as it only looked good, trading without stops. Once or twice a bad trade was taken, a worse trade than 10 year backtests revealed, and because there was no stop it just carried on going south until hitting mc or being closed manually..
I wish someone had pointed out to me then that 'straight line' EAs look good, but eventually bites you in the backside..
forex_trader_149646
Sep 09, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물471
Nov 26, 2015 at 07:58
RSTrading posted:
I wish someone had pointed out to me then that 'straight line' EAs look good, but eventually bites you in the backside..
Should be obvious RST. Straight lines often use poor R:R to achieve just that.
Risk 1000 Pips to earn 2 pips, you'll get many winners before that loser comes( also 1000 pip move would take normally a few months to take place.). In theory, if you can achieve 500 New scalps to offset that 1 loser, you could essentially recover, but adding another position changes your money management structure unless you already built it in when deciding your first lotsize.
forex_trader_139412
Jul 16, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물385
Nov 26, 2015 at 08:17
Yes, in hindsight.. It was pretty dumb..
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
