Edit Your Comment
re volume new feature - got a question please.
Jan 15, 2013 at 08:05
Nov 18, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물18
Yowsa this is great.
https://www.myfxbook.com/forex-broker-volume
https://www.myfxbook.com/forex-broker-volume/fxopen-ecn-EURUSD-volume/272,1
https://www.myfxbook.com/forex-broker-volume/fxopen-ecn/272
Truly great, and results truly surprising too at times.
But forgive me, i want to ask.
Is it accurate? What is it saying?
I think from memory that volume in MT4 was more re: ........... err not sure ...... maybe not 'lots traded per tick' but more - maybe just showing activity and not lots within the activity. ????
So is this volume being sourced from MT4 or are brokers providing data other than via MT4 client?
I see that same rules apply to each broker, but if a broker is using feeds via Currenex, LMAX and Integral - could it be that the volume is showing this part of the world rather than lots on this specific broker ?????
Also maybe the data provider for e.g. Integral may be in an agreement with a broker to provide a certain level of local liquidity.
So again the 60 trades maybe more a view of this 'portal' of activity. And there maybe slight duplication in counts.
As a guess this is MT4 volume data - thus is showing activity and not lots. So you do not know if that trade was 1 lot or 20 lots.
Then again maybe the software has been updated over time.
Anyway i'm not sure it matters and anything I say will make a difference, but I was curious to ask the above.
One scanrio for instance - if i wanted to trade GBPJPY and were not on a TOP broker but on a broker that showed 1/2 that - is it safe to assume that 'uptake or downstream liquidity level' may be such that a, for e.g. a 50 lot trade could be filled just as well.
https://www.myfxbook.com/forex-broker-volume
https://www.myfxbook.com/forex-broker-volume/fxopen-ecn-EURUSD-volume/272,1
https://www.myfxbook.com/forex-broker-volume/fxopen-ecn/272
Truly great, and results truly surprising too at times.
But forgive me, i want to ask.
Is it accurate? What is it saying?
I think from memory that volume in MT4 was more re: ........... err not sure ...... maybe not 'lots traded per tick' but more - maybe just showing activity and not lots within the activity. ????
So is this volume being sourced from MT4 or are brokers providing data other than via MT4 client?
I see that same rules apply to each broker, but if a broker is using feeds via Currenex, LMAX and Integral - could it be that the volume is showing this part of the world rather than lots on this specific broker ?????
Also maybe the data provider for e.g. Integral may be in an agreement with a broker to provide a certain level of local liquidity.
So again the 60 trades maybe more a view of this 'portal' of activity. And there maybe slight duplication in counts.
As a guess this is MT4 volume data - thus is showing activity and not lots. So you do not know if that trade was 1 lot or 20 lots.
Then again maybe the software has been updated over time.
Anyway i'm not sure it matters and anything I say will make a difference, but I was curious to ask the above.
One scanrio for instance - if i wanted to trade GBPJPY and were not on a TOP broker but on a broker that showed 1/2 that - is it safe to assume that 'uptake or downstream liquidity level' may be such that a, for e.g. a 50 lot trade could be filled just as well.
forex_trader_101400
Dec 01, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물65
Jan 21, 2013 at 23:36
Dec 01, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물65
There's a lot more information that can be gleamed from this besides liquidity. FXSalt seems to do most of the volume. So they can claim that they are the biggest retail forex broker around.
I suppose the data comes from real accounts being tracked here in myfxbook. Maybe be not because there's a discrepancy with FxSalts votes in Broker reviews and their volume. You would think the biggest broker would have a lot of votes. Oanda has the most volumes but their volume is small.
Finally, I think Oanda's volume is small because they cater mostly to those who trade 1 unit, of 0.00001 lots.
I suppose the data comes from real accounts being tracked here in myfxbook. Maybe be not because there's a discrepancy with FxSalts votes in Broker reviews and their volume. You would think the biggest broker would have a lot of votes. Oanda has the most volumes but their volume is small.
Finally, I think Oanda's volume is small because they cater mostly to those who trade 1 unit, of 0.00001 lots.
Jan 28, 2013 at 13:09
Nov 16, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물12
Hello All guys!!
In my opinion, this has nothing to do with the volume but only the variation of price during each time frame. If you compare the activity of two different brokers on the same time frame and pair, it clearly shows not the volume but the modifications of the price during one unit time. One broker should have a best large data provider with less smooth/even out datas.
You can see that there is no big deviation in regards of the average unless the price is growing/falling quicly (when you have big volumes).
In my opinion, this has nothing to do with the volume but only the variation of price during each time frame. If you compare the activity of two different brokers on the same time frame and pair, it clearly shows not the volume but the modifications of the price during one unit time. One broker should have a best large data provider with less smooth/even out datas.
You can see that there is no big deviation in regards of the average unless the price is growing/falling quicly (when you have big volumes).
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.