Edit Your Comment
Tick Data for Backesting
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
Nov 29, 2013 at 10:48
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
Hi,
I would like to test an EA with 99% modeling data.
I have downloaded Tickstory to download the data. Unfortunately I have a pb when running it so I can't use it.
Does anyone could send the tickdata file .HST (format to be ready to be upload edinto MT4 Archieve) 1M on GBPUSD for 2013
Cheers
I would like to test an EA with 99% modeling data.
I have downloaded Tickstory to download the data. Unfortunately I have a pb when running it so I can't use it.
Does anyone could send the tickdata file .HST (format to be ready to be upload edinto MT4 Archieve) 1M on GBPUSD for 2013
Cheers
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
Dec 08, 2013 at 08:05
Jul 02, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물57
Tickstory downloads 99% quality data from dukascopy to your mt4 folder.
You can also change the leverage and spread.
https://prntscr.com/29hmzi
https://prntscr.com/29hnxk
Sleep is for the weak
Jan 02, 2014 at 07:38
Dec 29, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물6
For free tick data please check https://www.fxtalk.eu under Automated trading.
NO ads, NO hidden sales and NO gimmicks forum for EA traders. Free tick data downloads!
Mar 15, 2014 at 09:55
(편집됨 Mar 15, 2014 at 09:59)
Feb 12, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물63
For REAL tick data you need Tickstory. Real tick data is HUGE in size and therefore can't be downloaded anywhere (afaik).
M1 data only, for the period of 1 year would be something over a half GB in size :)
Real tick data of multiple timeframes and multiple pairs from the period of several years would probably fill the whole remaining free space on your HD, possibly you would need a seperate HD for that data :D
M1 data only, for the period of 1 year would be something over a half GB in size :)
Real tick data of multiple timeframes and multiple pairs from the period of several years would probably fill the whole remaining free space on your HD, possibly you would need a seperate HD for that data :D
Jun 03, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물696
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
Mar 15, 2014 at 22:07
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1718
I have noticed that even 99.99% modeleing tick data is kinda useless.
Now I'm doing a funny demo test on 3 different brokers with same parameters.
Guess what... I don't get 100% same trades from them.
As price provided by brokers can be different and my strategy is based on a very accurate price to enter... 1 pips difference from each MT4 is enough to generate a trade or miss it out.
For me Backtesting is only a matter to check if EA is doing 100% what it should do.
Now I'm doing a funny demo test on 3 different brokers with same parameters.
Guess what... I don't get 100% same trades from them.
As price provided by brokers can be different and my strategy is based on a very accurate price to enter... 1 pips difference from each MT4 is enough to generate a trade or miss it out.
For me Backtesting is only a matter to check if EA is doing 100% what it should do.
Mar 17, 2014 at 08:00
Aug 02, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물38
I agree. Backtesting is very broker specific and only means that there is no price difference across different time frames. All prices are calculated based on the lowest time frame if I'm not mistaken. I also try more than one data provider for backtesting and compare the results. For me backtesting using tick story is exhausting. I'd rather use data from forex tester or Alpari.
Wait for it
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.