Megadroid risk 0.2 no recovery mode (에 의해 iamfxfapturbo)
The user has deleted this strategy.
Megadroid risk 0.2 no recovery mode 토론
Sep 01, 2013 at 15:52
1,160 개의 뷰
8 Replies
Feb 12, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물12
Feb 08, 2014 at 08:14
Hello!
I saw Your Megadroid test and was really exciting.
I have couple questions:
Each Broker are you using?
Can You explain, in 2007 didn't was on the stage this Expert advisor.
How could be the test from 2007.Or maybe with the tester?
Is this real account or demo?
Anyway thank You in advance if You want to answer.
Have a nice day!
VinnieForex
I saw Your Megadroid test and was really exciting.
I have couple questions:
Each Broker are you using?
Can You explain, in 2007 didn't was on the stage this Expert advisor.
How could be the test from 2007.Or maybe with the tester?
Is this real account or demo?
Anyway thank You in advance if You want to answer.
Have a nice day!
VinnieForex
Dec 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물18
Feb 09, 2014 at 15:33
Hello.
The broker i use is Pepperstone.
It is a real account.
For me, i just wanted to use 5-year-data to see how the EA performs. So 2007 is not important for me at that moment.
I'm no longer use this EA and Pipjet anymore. It performs like the backtest, but sometimes, you can have three stop loss in a row and could bleed your account. It recovers, but it takes a lot of time, so this strategy is not for anyone.
To replace those EA, i have found other and i am pretty happy with my choice.
Thanks.
The broker i use is Pepperstone.
It is a real account.
For me, i just wanted to use 5-year-data to see how the EA performs. So 2007 is not important for me at that moment.
I'm no longer use this EA and Pipjet anymore. It performs like the backtest, but sometimes, you can have three stop loss in a row and could bleed your account. It recovers, but it takes a lot of time, so this strategy is not for anyone.
To replace those EA, i have found other and i am pretty happy with my choice.
Thanks.
Jun 03, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물696
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:08
Model Quality 0,0% and 'Control Points only' method.
And You are telling that 'It performs like the backtest' ? Sorry, but who will believe in this? 😁
And You are telling that 'It performs like the backtest' ? Sorry, but who will believe in this? 😁
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Dec 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물18
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:25
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really don't care if you believe in me or not.
Jun 03, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물696
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:27
Ok but even for You it should be not trustful backtest due its bad accuracy.
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Dec 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물18
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:45
And i repeat one more time:
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really don't care if you believe in me or not.
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really don't care if you believe in me or not.
Dec 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물18
Feb 14, 2014 at 14:06
And i repeat one more time:
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really DON'T CARE if you believe in me or not.
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really DON'T CARE if you believe in me or not.
Jun 03, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물696
Feb 14, 2014 at 15:35
Did he jamm himself?
dupapa - right point !
dupapa - right point !
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
