PAMM-account (에 의해 heslop)
| : 게인 | +135.81% |
| 드로다운 | 43.08% |
| 핍스: | 16055.7 |
| 거래 | 1449 |
| 원 : |
|
| 손실: |
|
| : 종류 | 리얼 |
| 레버리지: | 1:40 |
| 거래 : | 매뉴얼 |
PAMM-account 토론
Sep 12, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물313
Jun 10, 2010 at 22:05
u have lot of floting buddy
forex_trader_8795
Mar 16, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물2
Jun 23, 2010 at 09:05
kishorejoga posted:how do you know?
u have lot of floting buddy
Sep 12, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물313
Jun 23, 2010 at 13:26
because he hide balance and eqity
and Gain and abs gain difference
and Gain and abs gain difference
forex_trader_1819
Oct 18, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물230
Aug 08, 2010 at 09:30
(편집됨 Aug 08, 2010 at 09:32)
kishorejoga posted:
and Gain and abs gain difference
This does not mean the account has a lot of floating positions. Every time a deposit is made the absolute gain percentage decreases. When money is withdrawn the absolute gain percentage does not re-adjust to the new balance. I move money in and out of my accounts all the time. If I carry on doing this my absolute gain percentage will go negative. It's not a very good way of measuring performance if you are constantly depositing and withdrawing funds but not many people would know this on myfxbook because they probably don't get the opportunity to make a lot of withdrawals. The only time that the absolute gain percentage is relevant is on an account that has one deposit and that's it.
And, by the way, nice trading Heslop. It's refreshing to see an account in profit that is over a year old.
forex_trader_16563
Aug 10, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물55
Aug 11, 2010 at 20:50
Patience posted:
kishorejoga posted:
and Gain and abs gain difference
This does not mean the account has a lot of floating positions. Every time a deposit is made the absolute gain percentage decreases. When money is withdrawn the absolute gain percentage does not re-adjust to the new balance. I move money in and out of my accounts all the time. If I carry on doing this my absolute gain percentage will go negative. It's not a very good way of measuring performance if you are constantly depositing and withdrawing funds but not many people would know this on myfxbook because they probably don't get the opportunity to make a lot of withdrawals. The only time that the absolute gain percentage is relevant is on an account that has one deposit and that's it.
And, by the way, nice trading Heslop. It's refreshing to see an account in profit that is over a year old.
Whether you are right or wrong. I am not entirely sure. However, Honestly, I think this systems stats are very similar to this system.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/cadmaker/hayfork-1501/27428
The only difference is that this Guy is honest about the performance and Victor Heslop Hides beside Private Doors..
The reason why I think this system is Junk, Not profitable and is Probably no better than HAYFORK, is if you look at the Monthly gains over a period of time, you will see that the gains constantly decrease in size month after month.. I have read a lot of comments on this site AND I would have to say this system is Not Profitable. Victor obviously has something to hide.
No vouches for this system either.. I know the vouches do not mean much as friends, can up the vouches but it does prove that other members see this system as I do..
If this trader will not display is Equity then I am 100% correct until proven otherwise.. And once again. The HAYFORK is the perfect example and resembles this system perfectly..
Once Myfxbook Releases the External Money Manager Section, we will see if this system actually makes it to the list. If so, then I apologize. If not, then this system is just another misrepresented Account performance and is labeled in the Scammer category.
forex_trader_1819
Oct 18, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물230
Aug 11, 2010 at 21:41
(편집됨 Aug 11, 2010 at 22:07)
zebra posted: Whether you are right or wrong. I am not entirely sure. However, Honestly, I think this systems stats are very similar to this system.
I just wanted to point out that the difference between 'gain' and 'absolute gain' does not mean that there are a lot of floating positions. There may well be a lot of floating positions on this account but comparing gain and absolute gain is not the way to determine that.
forex_trader_8139
Mar 04, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물423
Aug 11, 2010 at 21:43
gain and absolute gain only related to deposit and withdraw your account.
SIM
SIM
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Aug 12, 2010 at 07:05
How about you open up your positions and then after that people might vouch for you?
That seems a much more appropriate way to do things
That seems a much more appropriate way to do things
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09
If you make a bit of research on this account you can see that this guy had very large DD. If you look at the lenght of the trades you can see that the lenght of the trade on EU was 13 weeks. He closed this trade at the beginning of thiis month and i went back 13 weeks and here is what i saw. He went long on EU@ 1.306 in the beginning of May. He had 1200 pips DD already and he still had the positions opened. As i said before he closed them at the beginning of August. I know he was long because if he was short at that price he would of taken the profit earlier. Simmilar thing happened in July as he had only one position closed on EU with holding time of 9.39 weeks. From this you can assume that he was loading up the positions on EU as it was diving and closing them as it went up. You can check it out very easily on his profile page. All in all it doesnt bother me because i dont have my money invested wth him but it bothers me when he is saying how he is using SL. Apparently he is using SL selectively😉
I might be wrong but there is a way for Viktor to prove me wrong. He could just unlock the trading history and we can check out what is real and what is not.
I might be wrong but there is a way for Viktor to prove me wrong. He could just unlock the trading history and we can check out what is real and what is not.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Aug 12, 2010 at 15:38
I'm not sure that's how the vouchers were intended to work. It was more a case of people earn trust and respect and then they get a voucher.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
