RobotX (에 의해 robotxpro)
: 게인 | +456.53% |
드로다운 | 32.87% |
핍스: | 1293.1 |
거래 | 35 |
원 : |
|
손실: |
|
: 종류 | 리얼 |
레버리지: | 1:500 |
거래 : | 알려지지 않음 |
Edit Your Comment
RobotX 토론
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:23
(편집됨 Nov 26, 2017 at 21:25)
Jan 20, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물70
CLKDTM23 posted:successwill posted:
Any backtest from the buyers?
Yes, performs well on backtest as advertised but I have forward demo and live will not trade, support says maybe needs to run alone without other e.a.'s but I never had that problem and ive had at least 50 e.a.'s so my theory is the code of the e.a. is flawed
Yes. A similar problem.
Week without trade. On account I have 8 EA.
According to the recommendation, started on the separate MT4.
Also obtained the license free of charge.
Everything has begun to work as EA author)
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:24
Jan 20, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물70
michaelkim posted:expert2 posted:michaelkim posted:
Hi expert2,
My friend said that the results is not the same as your account here.
Why??
If the results is the same as your account over here, I am going to purchase ExpertX
I have bought more than 50 EA.
It I am happy with work and profit.
I think to you it is necessary to write the question to support service for consultation.
I have no assumptions why your friend has different results
If it is not working the same as your account, will you refund my money?? Then I will buy your EA.
Thanks.
Sorry, I did not do refund you money. I do not sell it EA...
Nov 18, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물247
Dec 03, 2017 at 09:08
(편집됨 Dec 03, 2017 at 09:09)
Nov 18, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물247
bbc81 posted:
I also wonder if anyone has tried it on live account. It looks amazing so far but I am always sceptical about commercial EAs. Why in the world would someone sell an EA with great results like this?
This account uses very high risk. thats why the results look so amazing..You should use 1/4 of this risk in your account. Maybe less for medium/long term investment.
Backtest results seem good so far and still no trade on my demo account..Still testing.
Dec 04, 2017 at 22:17
Sep 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물12
support site https://www.smartfxtechnology.com.ua URL DOES NOT EXSIST
Dec 04, 2017 at 22:46
Oct 23, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물351
i thought url was www.robotx.pro
if you follow the flock like sheep you always end up stepping in shit!
Dec 07, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물134
Dec 04, 2017 at 23:05
Dec 07, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물134
It looks like it can risk about 60% at a time if I am correct in seeing up to two positions open at a time. And how do we know for sure that only two can open. I see drawdowns of over 200 pips so the actual open drawdown has been far larger than the myfxbook account is showing. I agree with the above comment about running it at only 25% of default settings.
Be afraid, very afraid?
Dec 05, 2017 at 01:21
Sep 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물12
it is but when trying to get a refund from advantage they said that's is the vendors support, although today it finally traded I don't know if it is the same results as vendor account but I do know this e.a. will definitely not work with any other e.a.'s
Dec 05, 2017 at 02:08
Oct 23, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물351
yea i haven't heard good things about https://www.smartfxtechnology.com.ua/ actually quite the opposite, but hopefully this EA will pan out for a few people before crashing as its definitely overleveraging, if your using it id decrease lots by 3x..
if you follow the flock like sheep you always end up stepping in shit!
Dec 07, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물134
Dec 08, 2017 at 19:27
Jan 20, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물70
RoboFX123 posted:
Not good. Problem with Refund: https://goo.gl/4NVer4
For what return? EA works super😀
Dec 10, 2017 at 08:23
Sep 24, 2017 부터 멤버
게시물7
hi all,
specially I add signals, for people who to be afraid not of compliance on their Meta trader 4.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/367586
specially I add signals, for people who to be afraid not of compliance on their Meta trader 4.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/367586
Nov 18, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물247
Dec 07, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물134
Jan 18, 2018 at 15:53
(편집됨 Jan 18, 2018 at 15:55)
Dec 07, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물134
Not updating for such a long time is just a simple strategy to hide the open drawdown. If it recovers the vendor will activate it again and have the appearance of a safe trade, or safer trade, since it was a bad one for sure.
But if you go the vendors own signal account on mql5.com that is posted above then you can see the disastrous results thus far.
This is a complete failure.
But if you go the vendors own signal account on mql5.com that is posted above then you can see the disastrous results thus far.
This is a complete failure.
Be afraid, very afraid?
Nov 18, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물247
Jan 18, 2018 at 18:39
Nov 18, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물247
robotchallenge posted:
Not updating for such a long time is just a simple strategy to hide the open drawdown. If it recovers the vendor will activate it again and have the appearance of a safe trade, or safer trade, since it was a bad one for sure.
But if you go the vendors own signal account on mql5.com that is posted above then you can see the disastrous results thus far.
This is a complete failure.
This is not going to recover. Because it hit stoploss twice. that means nearly 40% loss. My demo acc hit first stoploss and GBPUSD doesnt seem to be on the path towards south..
If he is not a scammer, he should refund our money
Dec 07, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물134
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.