SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) (에 의해 andryuha77)
The user has made his system private.
Edit Your Comment
SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) 토론
May 21, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물13
Oct 18, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물9
May 21, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물13
May 21, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물13
Aug 20, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물216
Oct 22, 2010 at 20:11
(편집됨 Oct 22, 2010 at 20:35)
Aug 20, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물216
This system is the presently nr.1 ranked system at Zulutrade as far as I know:
https://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at https://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site https://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
https://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at https://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site https://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
forex_trader_4072
Dec 05, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물19
Oct 23, 2010 at 03:28
Dec 05, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물19
stephanusR posted:
On this site https://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
Its in the top right hand corner of that page champ,
Recharge | Withdrawal, USD 48354.22 | -4449.17
I've been watching him on all those sites for a few months and his system does seem to work, though for followers using fixed lot size not so well. IE - zulutrade.
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.