- Strona główna
- Społeczność
- Systemy handlowe
- FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com
FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com (Od NickMcDonald)
Użytkownik usunął ten system.
Edit Your Comment
FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com Omówić
Uczestnik z Jan 25, 2010
1360 postów
Jun 17, 2013 at 06:31
Uczestnik z Jan 25, 2010
1360 postów
Please provide a subscription link somewhere! I don't know how I subscribed before, but I can't seem to resubscribe!
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
Jun 18, 2013 at 03:24
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
The signal is no longer being sold. They will be putting together a PAMM account soon.
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
Uczestnik z Apr 22, 2010
123 postów
Uczestnik z Jul 17, 2012
275 postów
Jul 11, 2013 at 06:58
Uczestnik z Jul 17, 2012
275 postów
not just july i presume...
Past experience usually helps present self
Uczestnik z Oct 27, 2011
86 postów
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
Jul 11, 2013 at 13:47
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
NickMcDonald posted:
We finally picked up a winner today. The recovery begins :)
I sure hope so Nick . . . there is a long way to go.
Uczestnik z Oct 27, 2011
86 postów
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
Jul 16, 2013 at 19:49
Uczestnik z Nov 07, 2012
85 postów
Aplmustdie posted:
Another wonderful trade . . .
If this trade doesn't win I think I'll stop until new high water mark. Then I can have trust in the trader again.
5-15pip TP with 50+ SL can be 10:1 r/r and that can take a long time to recover if ever.😞
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
Jul 23, 2013 at 17:21
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
uk_max posted:
shouldn't the drawdown be about 50% and not 25%?
Your account had almost 100% gain ( $8,000 profit ) and now its near 50% gain. Only shows a 25% loss in the month of July while you missed out on 4k profit banked profit 😳
Drawdown is based on the size of the entire account, not just the profits.
Uczestnik z Apr 22, 2010
123 postów
Jul 24, 2013 at 07:54
(edytowane Jul 24, 2013 at 07:58)
Uczestnik z Apr 22, 2010
123 postów
hold&pray
the only worse than that is 'averaging'
3 months are in the bin already (that is only for those happy ppl which are from the beginning of it...)
the only worse than that is 'averaging'
3 months are in the bin already (that is only for those happy ppl which are from the beginning of it...)
Uczestnik z Apr 22, 2010
123 postów
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
Aug 07, 2013 at 19:27
Uczestnik z Jul 05, 2011
305 postów
mirusevxs33 posted:
no stops? even mental....????
There's a stop, he just keeps moving it, 😉
forex_trader_88964
Uczestnik z Aug 24, 2012
119 postów
Aug 07, 2013 at 19:37
Uczestnik z Aug 24, 2012
119 postów
I don't understand how some people can follow you really....
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:27
Uczestnik z Aug 07, 2013
23 postów
Guys,
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
Uczestnik z Apr 22, 2010
123 postów
Aug 26, 2013 at 20:07
Uczestnik z Apr 22, 2010
123 postów
Aplmustdie posted:😲mirusevxs33 posted:
no stops? even mental....????
There's a stop, he just keeps moving it, 😉
*Komercyjne wykorzystanie i spam są nieprawidłowe i mogą spowodować zamknięcie konta.
Wskazówka: opublikowanie adresu URL obrazu / YouTube automatycznie wstawi go do twojego postu!
Wskazówka: wpisz znak@, aby automatycznie wypełnić nazwę użytkownika uczestniczącego w tej dyskusji.