sPhantom Auto Trader (Por sPhantom)
Ganho : | +694.0% |
Limite de prejuízo | 91.94% |
Pips: | 1266.4 |
Negociações | 261 |
Ganho: |
|
Perdido: |
|
Tipo: | Real |
Vantagem: | 1:400 |
Negociação: | Automatizado |
Edit Your Comment
sPhantom Auto Trader Discussão
Jan 30, 2014 at 15:15
Membro Desde Jan 06, 2014
256 posts
Speaking from an Elliott wave perspective (and in don't think EW fits well with forex market) we are now in a 3rd wave down, and will be very difficult that a 4th wave retracement will be able save us. But we'll see!!😕
Running only Expert advisors with good long term backtests and nice forward tests
Membro Desde Dec 31, 2012
101 posts
Jan 30, 2014 at 15:44
Membro Desde Dec 31, 2012
101 posts
I bit the bullet and bailed out, I am not going to potentially risk my entire equity on one trade. The larger trend is effectively very bearish and even the Asian session retrace will probably not save it much. Tapering by the largest economy in the world does have resounding effects, and this EA made a trade right before that decision announcement (extremely bad in my opinion, especially considering that it was commonly agreed that the tapering will continue).
Losing half your stack is devastating, but it's not catastrophic. Here's to coming back to fight another day (with a lower risk), and good luck to the rest of you with the retrace!
Losing half your stack is devastating, but it's not catastrophic. Here's to coming back to fight another day (with a lower risk), and good luck to the rest of you with the retrace!
BLTW777@
Membro Desde Dec 31, 2012
101 posts
Membro Desde Mar 08, 2011
11 posts
Membro Desde Sep 23, 2013
45 posts
Jan 30, 2014 at 16:53
Membro Desde Aug 20, 2011
588 posts
the worst batch in the history was -113pips for the trade 1 and -89pips for the trade 2, so a cumulative of -202pips.
currently its -122 and -91pips... so they break they record :)
strangely... my second trade has only -55pips not -91!!! so opened far lower than the official account one...
currently its -122 and -91pips... so they break they record :)
strangely... my second trade has only -55pips not -91!!! so opened far lower than the official account one...
Membro Desde Sep 23, 2013
45 posts
Jan 30, 2014 at 17:14
Membro Desde Sep 23, 2013
45 posts
sPhantom posted:youngchang posted:
Hello sPhantom,
In your account history, Your EA did not trade for a week from 06/16, Why????
Did you stop it or EA did not trade by itself?
Regards. Young
Hi
There was no trade on that period. It was because of fundamental events.
Regards
sPhantom, I hope you're reading this, and I hope you go back to this policy...
"Press On" has solved and will always solve, the problems of the Human Race
Jan 30, 2014 at 17:16
Membro Desde Jan 17, 2011
58 posts
Lucky you. You can modify strategy - open low risk orders, but after second order it keeps going dow, open more manual positions with same or even closer tp :) if sphantom is so lucky, and will hit tp every time, you'll only benefit from that 'addon' orders, or be safe earler :)
Membro Desde Dec 28, 2013
22 posts
Jan 30, 2014 at 17:18
Membro Desde Dec 28, 2013
22 posts
UncleSteve posted:sPhantom posted:youngchang posted:
Hello sPhantom,
In your account history, Your EA did not trade for a week from 06/16, Why????
Did you stop it or EA did not trade by itself?
Regards. Young
Hi
There was no trade on that period. It was because of fundamental events.
Regards
sPhantom, I hope you're reading this, and I hope you go back to this policy...
LOL! A real eye opener for this young chang... ;)
Anyone was able to get in touch with Benton so far?
Jan 30, 2014 at 17:21
Membro Desde Jan 17, 2011
58 posts
UncleSteve, what do you expect they will say? We are sorry and gona to compensate all traders? :)
They will repeat what has been said many times here - its up to you what level of risk you accept and setin your settings. There are no systems in the world with no failures
They will repeat what has been said many times here - its up to you what level of risk you accept and setin your settings. There are no systems in the world with no failures
Membro Desde Sep 23, 2013
45 posts
Jan 30, 2014 at 17:24
Membro Desde Sep 23, 2013
45 posts
@pilotas - of course, and I'm not trading with scared money either. However, last weeks loss should have warned them not to trade news, and it didn't.
Especially as there was evidently a time when they were more careful.
Look at the curve of their chart, every now and then theres a big glitch; but you'd hope that each time they'd analyze what went wrong.
Especially as there was evidently a time when they were more careful.
Look at the curve of their chart, every now and then theres a big glitch; but you'd hope that each time they'd analyze what went wrong.
"Press On" has solved and will always solve, the problems of the Human Race
Jan 30, 2014 at 17:55
(editado Jan 30, 2014 at 17:57)
Membro Desde Apr 19, 2011
13 posts
Agree, trading just before the FOMC was mad.
However its probably my fault - every single EA I buy tanks as soon as I buy it - I bought this one a couple of weeks ago - sorry about that!
I'm only on 10% risk - so not catastrophic.
However its probably my fault - every single EA I buy tanks as soon as I buy it - I bought this one a couple of weeks ago - sorry about that!
I'm only on 10% risk - so not catastrophic.
Jan 30, 2014 at 18:02
(editado Jan 30, 2014 at 18:06)
Membro Desde Jan 17, 2011
58 posts
I do not believe into miracles. There are no such systems in reality with so quick and so big gain with no or small risk. You want less risk? Then you will get less gain or in longer time. But here is even worse. Potential 1, and only 1 loss is greater than all accumulated gain made before, so statisticaly in long run you will have slower or faster, depending on risk, saw style balance chart. And eventualy sooner or later it will end up with burned account. So the best tactics here is grab and run
*Uso comercial e spam não serão tolerados, podendo resultar no encerramento da conta.
Dica: Postar uma imagem/URL do YouTube irá incorporá-la automaticamente no seu post!
Dica: Insira o sinal @ para preencher automaticamente um nome de utilizador que participe nesta discussão.