EA vs Managed Account? Pros vs Cons

Mar 05, 2012 at 07:16
2,189 การดู
12 Replies
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 27, 2011   8 โพสต์
Mar 05, 2012 at 07:16
What are the pros and cons of choosing an EA?
What are the pros and cons of choosing a Managed Account?
Which one is better? Managed Accounts or EAs?
Do we want a trader behind the wheel to watch out for significant moves or do we prefer an unemotional program to make non discretionary decisions?

Thank you for your input!

Michael
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 13, 2010   43 โพสต์
Mar 05, 2012 at 08:15
Interesting topic and questions. If you get many detailed answers and insights, you'll uncover a lot of dirty secrets in the forex industry :)
"The first rule of forecasting should be that the unforeseen keeps making the future unforeseeable." - David McCasland (January 5,2012, Our Daily Bread)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 27, 2011   8 โพสต์
Mar 05, 2012 at 15:35
Thanks for the feedback Paul Ng!

Any secrets or experience you can share from your own journeys?
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 18, 2011   3 โพสต์
Mar 06, 2012 at 07:09
Do you ever believe that there is a CHEAP MONEY PRINTER at all?
Before earning, try keeping your money.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 13, 2010   43 โพสต์
Mar 06, 2012 at 12:44
Hmm... most forums already have debates on the pros and cons, so I'll just give my 2cents worth in a very short summary.

1) EAs that are stable, profitable, and sustainable, will never be for sale. Readers should write their own EA, or collaborate with others to develop their own EAs and systems.

2) Managed accounts are definitely better than buying an EA. When choosing a managed account, the broker and websites such as myfxbook have the trade log and can match with exact magic numbers, and trace the entries, SL, TP, order modifications. So, if the system gets a lot of attention and more money gets attracted to it, everyone else will have a vested interest to play against it. Example, playing pokers with your cards laid out on the table, even if you have a strong hand, the odds are against you the longer and bigger you play.

3) All systems have their weaknesses. The designer of the system is the best person to intervene, enable or disable toggles, but the difficulty lies in finding such a person who acts in the best interest of the investors.

4) There is only one rule in OTC forex. Look for the loser. If you can't find one, you are the loser. As a financial derivative, all trades have a counter party in order to get filled, that's how one will win and the other will lose.

I think it will be more meaningful to readers and forum participants here to experiment, audit, analyse the situations I describe below:

1) price freeze and frequent disconnections = poor quality of service to customers. Brokers should stop blaming the ISPs and other factors. I'll just stop short of saying it's market manipulation.

2) simple experiment scenario: send 3 orders at Market.
Buy1=ordersend( , , , , Ask, );
Buy2=ordersend( , , , , Ask, );
Buy3=ordersend( , , , , Ask, );

All orders are instantly sent to the broker. The subsequent response can reveal a lot about your broker. If every order has a consistent lag of 1-3 seconds, it raises a red flag (front running of customers' orders). If price turns up the moment your 1st order goes in, and the other 2 orders at Market 'fizzle off', then the broker has poor execution. A Market order must get filled. If price goes down against you, all 3 orders will surely get filled - interesting to take note of the filled prices and time stamp. If all are filled at exactly the same fraction of a pip (5th decimal place for EURUSD, for example), and the time stamp has a consistent delay between orders, that means the broker has a conflict of interest with the customer. On most occassions during active market hours, all 3 orders should have different fill prices if the time stamp is different, depending on the price action. Playing with the orders at the back-end can be considered Market Manipulation and Market Misconduct, disadvantaging the clients that they are supposed to serve (thereby receiving their license). If any trader reading this has had such experiences, you may want to consider video screening the chain of events and send the evidence to the relevant authorities. For brokers that are using such dirty tricks, it is very easy to reproduce the cause and effect on video, just make sure your lot size is the smallest possible for such experiments.

Any of these situations can lead to disciplinary action or cause a revoke of license. It is a good thing for anyone interested to trade the forex markets. At least when we do a internet search, there will be fewer websites to look through and chances are the remaining ones are the proper establishments for us to regard as a professional and ethical business partner.

I won't consider these insights as 'secrets', just that every time an honest observation appears on the internet, it gets swarmed and discredited by lots of other posts. No bonus points for guessing who may be motivated to reply against my post. Everywhere we click, there's spam advertising, referral agents, introducing brokers, sure-win EAs, etc etc. It's overwhelming the internet.

I'm not out to become a public enemy, just asking readers to do their own homework.

Peace.



"The first rule of forecasting should be that the unforeseen keeps making the future unforeseeable." - David McCasland (January 5,2012, Our Daily Bread)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 07, 2012   2 โพสต์
Mar 07, 2012 at 22:17
I think human mind is more powerful than EA. An expert trader knows when to enter the market, when to sell, and when to buy. What do you think ??

amantrader
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 06, 2012   22 โพสต์
Mar 08, 2012 at 19:26
i agree to Paul Ng and not to waed. Human mind is the worst enemy of traders. a useful combination where the systems executes automatically and is monitored by humans that know when and how to interfere should do the trick. i have been in the business for more than 10 years and i have seen many, many manual traders - and i have not really seen winners in the long term. i started seeing winners when EAs became popular - although 99% of the EAs also make a loss in the long run because some bucket shops looks for some fools in order to get the money.
money-management with a win-win
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 13, 2010   43 โพสต์
Mar 10, 2012 at 15:56

   zeidoon posted:
   I think human mind is more powerful than EA. An expert trader knows when to enter the market, when to sell, and when to buy. What do you think ??

amantrader

In a sense, humans are far better than the EAs available today. But we do get tired, emotional, distracted, and we need time with family and friends, and to sleep. So the robot becomes a very good assistant in our daily activities. It does not argue or play office politics, will not resign, cannot steal our business or customers, and it maintains 100% discipline and risk management.

Risk management alone is the golden rule that cannot be broken. If you just make a careless mistake and exceed your permitted risk, your career is over. EAs, managed accounts, manual trading, they all have their pros and cons. A suitable match between the trader/investor and the available tools becomes the deciding factor. Everyone has their own preferences, as well as risk appetite.

If you have a good assistant, you do not need to sit at the trading terminal all day. You can set alerts, log-in via remote and manage your trades as though you're at your work desk. You can also have many choices, like manual opening of positions and letting the robot manage them, or making the robot look through 10 charts every second. In summary, technology is meant to help us.

My sincere apologies to those who have lost their jobs to robots. This is a global trend regardless of industry, mechanical and routine tasks are getting replaced by automation. What we need is to think better and work smarter.



"The first rule of forecasting should be that the unforeseen keeps making the future unforeseeable." - David McCasland (January 5,2012, Our Daily Bread)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 27, 2009   28 โพสต์
Mar 14, 2012 at 00:16
When it comes to trading your money it is impossible to control your human emotions. Therefore, since the Forex market is basically computers trading computers, it is always less stressful to fight fire with fire. But, most traders are lazy, and usually quit once the live account is blown up.. in less than 90 days.

Stop fooling yourself, find the right automated system, or just contact me.
Relax, and Get Paid!
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 16, 2012   30 โพสต์
Mar 30, 2012 at 17:59
Look at my portfolio and you will be forced to agree that AUTOMATED Trading is the best option
To become the biggest fund manager of this world
TradeCopier2012
forex_trader_67014
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 24, 2012   77 โพสต์
Apr 02, 2012 at 06:39
hi,
a lot of very good stuff in here.
One thing is missing: because of the huge market and selling business and quick rich schemes: There Is NO Holy Grail anywhere!
And Quick Rich always means Scam or Too much of high risk.
Opinions about Systems, manual or automated, are wide. They all have their plus and minus. But as the market changes quite often the minus is möstly the topic.
Trading and testing a couple of years now I took my experience about systems and Strategies and sorted all out.
So for me right now G&M system is very profitable. Some will say now: oh my God, too much risk but it depends all on system and pairs, diversification and MM.
best wishes
Dirk
namesnaw
forex_trader_67356
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 27, 2012   3 โพสต์
Apr 02, 2012 at 14:34

   nasco posted:
   When it comes to trading your money it is impossible to control your human emotions. Therefore, since the Forex market is basically computers trading computers, it is always less stressful to fight fire with fire. But, most traders are lazy, and usually quit once the live account is blown up.. in less than 90 days.

Stop fooling yourself, find the right automated system, or just contact me.


this one is one example, trying to blind ppl with 15K deposit(but it's nano lot)... what a funny scammers
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 06, 2012   22 โพสต์
Apr 07, 2012 at 09:52
more than 10 yrs experience - also as a broker - have seen thousands of private traders and even EAs couldn't help most traders because they tend to interfere manually or constantly change settings. there are many more reasons why private traders loose but that will take to long.

to answer the question: definitely a money manager.
money-management with a win-win
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ