HEDGEPro - EXPIRED (โดย Fulltime247)
| กำไร : | +77.88% |
| ขาดทุนสะสม | 14.86% |
| pips: | 748.9 |
| การเทรด | 792 |
| ได้กำไร : |
|
| ขาดทุน : |
|
| ประเภท : | เดโม |
| เลเวอเรจ: | 1:100 |
| การเทรด : | อัตโนมัติ |
HEDGEPro - EXPIRED การสนทนา
Oct 09, 2009 at 12:47
2,023 การดู
12 Replies
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 31, 2009
131 โพสต์
Oct 18, 2009 at 00:34
(แก้ไขแล้ว Oct 18, 2009 at 00:43)
Thanks!! Its a pretty slick approach to the FX market. Very safe and very profitable. The EA is direction independent and can easily roll with market swings, reversals and trending. It works in pretty much any market condition. Its basically my greatest hits routines from EA's I've made over the years (trailing stops, BE profit protects, reversal detection, etc..) plus my latest price action theories. Its really foolproof and pretty bulletproof too. At this point my favorite thing about this EA is the way it LOVES volatility - I used to dread Fridays but I just love them now. Seems like I always end the week with a smile because the Robot cashes in on wild market swings like nothing I've ever seen. Still testing profit boosters but its at the point where I sleep easy not worrying about my forex investments (or if I'm gonna make money).
It ain't easy being Cheesy!
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 31, 2009
131 โพสต์
Oct 18, 2009 at 14:11
(แก้ไขแล้ว Oct 18, 2009 at 14:12)
dizustizy posted: Will you be offering this EA for sale?
Nope. Thats not even a option since MT4 Robot security if a joke!! The last time I tried to sell EA's commercially some jerk sent me a decompiled version within 24 hours!! Until Metaquotes fixes this I wont be selling EA's (and I've got MT5 and it looks like it has the same problems. They didnt even THINK about improving the security)
It ain't easy being Cheesy!
Oct 18, 2009 at 15:19
Fulltime247, you have several ways of protecting the code.
see here:
https://www.metatrader.info/node/132
see here:
https://www.metatrader.info/node/132
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 31, 2009
131 โพสต์
Oct 18, 2009 at 15:55
(แก้ไขแล้ว Oct 18, 2009 at 16:14)
All of the in-code methods can be removed by decompiling the source ($40 Decompiler Service - https://purebeam.biz/). The DLL method is the most secure but the 'phone-home' security isnt the best method for forex. Most DLL security involves giving the user a simple EA that only reads and executes signals from a master EA on my server BUT in the fast moving world of forex adding another internet round trip is a awkward solution at best. Since now signals would have a round trip from MASTER-->>User EA then User EA-->>Trade Server. - That's begging for 'Off Quotes' and 'Requote' responses from the trade server. Its the best security solution but far from perfect.
Thats why I prefer the Managed Account approach where I just setup the EA to directly trade the account for the user. Its only a single round trip and I can get a better profit sharing agreement with 100% security. I can easily makeup the loss of single sales income by making sure my users profit so that I can get a cut. Its a pure 'Put Up or Shut Up' deal. - They get access to a profitable EA and I create a ongoing profit stream that increases as I make more cash for my users. Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner.
Thats why I prefer the Managed Account approach where I just setup the EA to directly trade the account for the user. Its only a single round trip and I can get a better profit sharing agreement with 100% security. I can easily makeup the loss of single sales income by making sure my users profit so that I can get a cut. Its a pure 'Put Up or Shut Up' deal. - They get access to a profitable EA and I create a ongoing profit stream that increases as I make more cash for my users. Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner.
It ain't easy being Cheesy!
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 31, 2009
131 โพสต์
Oct 18, 2009 at 22:43
Ha!! Dizustizy I've noticed that every thread I read you're asking if the EA is available for sale. A number have responded 'Yes' so I'm sure you're OK. It would probably be more valuable for you to get a working EA in YOUR hands and play with it instead of using a managed service. 😁 - You must have been bored this weekend and just went on a EA request BLITZ!! (Good Luck with your search for a profitable system)
It ain't easy being Cheesy!
Oct 19, 2009 at 06:24
I just found this site so I did go kind of nuts! I will be using the EAs from forex goldmine on my larger 'safe and steady growth' account, but I'm looking for something higher growth (preferably hands-off) to use on my smaller, higher risk account. Thanks for the response!
Oct 19, 2009 at 11:32
Fulltime247 posted:
dizustizy posted: Will you be offering this EA for sale?
Nope. Thats not even a option since MT4 Robot security if a joke!! The last time I tried to sell EA's commercially some jerk sent me a decompiled version within 24 hours!! Until Metaquotes fixes this I wont be selling EA's (and I've got MT5 and it looks like it has the same problems. They didnt even THINK about improving the security)
i agree - do not give the ea to anyone. the only solution is a managed account where the client doesn't get the actual trading system to his hands.
Sleep is for the weak.
Nov 12, 2009 at 09:48
Doesn't matter about protection, They get the EA test it , blow up an account , rubbish it, end of story. Sometimes they make it better tho. Most people will pay you for it if it works. People are sick of paying for crap that doesn't work. No wonder they take pleasure in cracking them open to find they are ripped off some open code found on a forum some where.
What I'm saying is that if your ea works people will pay for it. The one's who crack will only use them on demo or very small accounts.
Signal's would work with the right trading system. (non scalping)
cheers
What I'm saying is that if your ea works people will pay for it. The one's who crack will only use them on demo or very small accounts.
Signal's would work with the right trading system. (non scalping)
cheers
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 31, 2009
131 โพสต์
Nov 12, 2009 at 22:36
I agree that honest users will pay for it BUT the crooks will decompile the EA and sell it. YOU'LL BE COMPETING WITH YOURSELF!! - A lot of the EA's on the market right now are copies of working EA's.
DeMark Lines EA=(Artemis, Forex Crusher) - ParabolicEA=(Transformer/Conqueror/Vampire/Espionage/Slasher) - Oktat=(PipZu) - Pseudocarcharias=(Forex Wonder) - Divergence Trader=(Pipsleader) - VForce EA=(MagicMachine). All of the Commercial EA's in '()' are 100% copies of the FREE source EA's. How do your think the original authors feel about their work being stolen and commercially marketed without them getting credit or a single dime? Also some of there EA's work quite well so you're incorrect in saying that cracked systems are only being used on demo/small accounts. Plenty are being used on LIVE accounts.
DeMark Lines EA=(Artemis, Forex Crusher) - ParabolicEA=(Transformer/Conqueror/Vampire/Espionage/Slasher) - Oktat=(PipZu) - Pseudocarcharias=(Forex Wonder) - Divergence Trader=(Pipsleader) - VForce EA=(MagicMachine). All of the Commercial EA's in '()' are 100% copies of the FREE source EA's. How do your think the original authors feel about their work being stolen and commercially marketed without them getting credit or a single dime? Also some of there EA's work quite well so you're incorrect in saying that cracked systems are only being used on demo/small accounts. Plenty are being used on LIVE accounts.
It ain't easy being Cheesy!
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ
