Three Pairs 2400 (โดย bestdarngood)
กำไร : | +52.21% |
ขาดทุนสะสม | 25.23% |
pips: | -1191.3 |
การเทรด | 401 |
ได้กำไร : |
|
ขาดทุน : |
|
ประเภท : | จริง |
เลเวอเรจ: | 1:50 |
การเทรด : | อัตโนมัติ |
Edit Your Comment
Three Pairs 2400 การสนทนา
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
Feb 21, 2017 at 08:21
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
very interesting system. Is it using a kind of triangular arbitrage I notice it trades pairs as though it could be closing baskets at the same time based on triangular arbitrage. Is this system available as an EA / signal? cheers
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
Feb 21, 2017 at 08:22
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
I just found the link on mql5 very interesting indeed. The return you have been getting on fxcm is much much higher than the expected return you talk about in the marketplace on mql5... why do you think this is? The monthly return to drawdown ratio is excellent on a 1:50 leveraged account.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
Feb 21, 2017 at 08:22
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
Also can you please verify this account. cheers
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 12, 2010
178 โพสต์
Feb 21, 2017 at 10:05
(แก้ไขแล้ว Feb 21, 2017 at 10:09)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 12, 2010
178 โพสต์
It was verified at one time, not sure why it got unverified. Just took care of it again.
I actually have two different EAs, a Fully Hedged and a Non Hedged 3 Pair EA. This one is the Fully Hedged one https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bestdarngood/fxcm-5000-d1/1822431
While the one you mention is not Fully Hedged and is more profitable because it can open/close more trades.
Both of them open trades when there are inefficiencies in the market (When the pairs are not in sync). For the Non Hedged one, it then can close a trade in profit fairly quickly because there is an overall direction being traded.
With the Fully Hedged one, a trade may take more time as the market will take more time to get more bias in the overall trade, but it is safer to use as you can trade more lots and be able to handle adverse market conditions.
Here is how to look at that it can work as an abnormal example. Take the current prices of 3 Fully Hedged Pairs such as Selling AUDUSD, Buying EURUSD, and Selling EURAUD. Then if they all went to a price of 1.00000, what kind of profit or loss would you make? You are basically opening at a bias, and then as the prices change, you are seeing a change in exposure to the pairs which produces an overall profit or loss.
Depending on which one you want, the fully hedged version is sold on the MQL4 marketplace, while this other one is only run on accounts where I take a 25% commission of profits monthly.
Regarding DD, I am running the risk quite high currently on the Three Pairs 2400. I plan to reduce my risk at the balance goes up as even though there should be a 90% or higher win rate (currently 100% win rate when you take 3 pairs as an overall trade), I am risk adverse and plan to not lose profits.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
I actually have two different EAs, a Fully Hedged and a Non Hedged 3 Pair EA. This one is the Fully Hedged one https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bestdarngood/fxcm-5000-d1/1822431
While the one you mention is not Fully Hedged and is more profitable because it can open/close more trades.
Both of them open trades when there are inefficiencies in the market (When the pairs are not in sync). For the Non Hedged one, it then can close a trade in profit fairly quickly because there is an overall direction being traded.
With the Fully Hedged one, a trade may take more time as the market will take more time to get more bias in the overall trade, but it is safer to use as you can trade more lots and be able to handle adverse market conditions.
Here is how to look at that it can work as an abnormal example. Take the current prices of 3 Fully Hedged Pairs such as Selling AUDUSD, Buying EURUSD, and Selling EURAUD. Then if they all went to a price of 1.00000, what kind of profit or loss would you make? You are basically opening at a bias, and then as the prices change, you are seeing a change in exposure to the pairs which produces an overall profit or loss.
Depending on which one you want, the fully hedged version is sold on the MQL4 marketplace, while this other one is only run on accounts where I take a 25% commission of profits monthly.
Regarding DD, I am running the risk quite high currently on the Three Pairs 2400. I plan to reduce my risk at the balance goes up as even though there should be a 90% or higher win rate (currently 100% win rate when you take 3 pairs as an overall trade), I am risk adverse and plan to not lose profits.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
See my profile or message me for my latest EA
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
Feb 21, 2017 at 15:19
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1557 โพสต์
this one which isn't fully hedged still seems to open and close the 3 trades all at the same time, like the original hedged version. The lot sizes are also even across all three pairs, so I still not quite sure of the difference..
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 12, 2010
178 โพสต์
Feb 21, 2017 at 15:24
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 12, 2010
178 โพสต์
There are different TP/SL and other settings. In both cases, the pairs trade as a set to help protect you against large market moves that trading one pair doesn't provide, but in the fully hedged program, you are just better protected, but to counter that with the other program, you just need to trade smaller lots in order to limit the risk. The Non Hedged program is more like a Basket Trading Program but with only 3 pairs.
See my profile or message me for my latest EA
Feb 21, 2017 at 15:45
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 29, 2016
264 โพสต์
ourmyfxbook@
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 12, 2010
178 โพสต์
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ