Million Dollar Pips (tarafından milliondpips)
| Kazanma : | +26241.17% |
| Düşüş | 39.44% |
| Pipler: | 5202.2 |
| Tradeler | 4497 |
| Kazandı: |
|
| Kaybetti: |
|
| Tür: | Demo |
| Kaldıraç: | 1:200 |
| Trading: | Otomatik |
Million Dollar Pips Tartışma
Aug 26, 2011 zamanından beri üye
4 iletiler
Aug 27, 2011 at 12:19
WARNING DO NOT USE THINK FOREX!
I just started running a live think forex account this week using their free VPS which has an average latency of 23ms which is ok but I also am getting absolutely BS execution and mod times of 33,000!! Think forex is definitely slowing this EA down on purpose. I will modify the EA comments and magic numbers and report back with the new results.
I just started running a live think forex account this week using their free VPS which has an average latency of 23ms which is ok but I also am getting absolutely BS execution and mod times of 33,000!! Think forex is definitely slowing this EA down on purpose. I will modify the EA comments and magic numbers and report back with the new results.
Fibo1123 posted:
I am running the 1.1.6 version live on thinkforex with a vps. Everytime it trades I get tremendous order modification times - above 2000 ms - printed on the chart.
First I though this is because of running it from my desktop, so I installed it on a VPS and it prints again the 2000-ish ms times. Then I thought it might be because of running two eas on one mt4 platform, so I left the MDP alone by itself on a separate platform, but now it does it again. I noticed this happens right after the first set of trades after installation.
I am pretty sure my latency to the broker is on average 3 ms, I measured it several times by different methods.
I also noticed that the times are getting bigger if I don't reinstall the bot and the mt4 (reinstallation of the bot only won't do) - last time it got above 10000ms, which is absurd. I am afraid this is not just a print error, but also affects the trading.
I run it with another broker live on the same vps and I have no such issues there.
I ran out of suggestions and the support seems to be clueless too. I never met a similar problem in the posts on myfxbook.
Did any of you get this problem with the bot?
I am reading about all those trades from today, but I only got 4 and the stupid message!
I am so sad, I do not know what to do... 😭😭😭
Oct 03, 2010 zamanından beri üye
155 iletiler
Aug 27, 2011 at 14:09
Pakfx posted:
krana posted:
does this system leave open trades and not close them... and let it run in loss. any input
no it doesnt do this kind of thing it open trade just for few seconds ..
attention please those who are not getting trade due to order execution prob try this setting
NO=0
AC=8
max SO=2
hard trailing=true
stop order=false
use apply ecn=true
risk mode comm pips=true
its safe as it wont open that much trade it will open less trade but will be in profit also please change your EA comment and magic no.
I can understand magic no. but what is the importance of the changing the EA comment. Is it to avoid confusion?
forex_trader_12567
May 29, 2010 zamanından beri üye
276 iletiler
Aug 27, 2011 at 14:57
changing the EA comment due to using customize setting. so, you can evaluate between the default one and pakfx settings :)
Jan 31, 2011 zamanından beri üye
724 iletiler
Aug 27, 2011 at 15:42
jsintl posted:
Pakfx posted:
krana posted:
does this system leave open trades and not close them... and let it run in loss. any input
no it doesnt do this kind of thing it open trade just for few seconds ..
attention please those who are not getting trade due to order execution prob try this setting
NO=0
AC=8
max SO=2
hard trailing=true
stop order=false
use apply ecn=true
risk mode comm pips=true
its safe as it wont open that much trade it will open less trade but will be in profit also please change your EA comment and magic no.
I can understand magic no. but what is the importance of the changing the EA comment. Is it to avoid confusion?
The reason is that brokers can also track the comments of an EA.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
Dec 15, 2010 zamanından beri üye
795 iletiler
Aug 27, 2011 at 16:12
I dont know if they could read the MDP comments in less than 3 sec's.... or bother with it. My trades just flash on and off and they are done. I just leave my coments blank .Just a fun comment, if they wanna try reading it, its like a dog reading hubcaps on a car, its just spinning to fst to bother with...
Click on my Name to see My Live Charts and Bio.
Jan 31, 2011 zamanından beri üye
724 iletiler
Aug 27, 2011 at 18:03
The process is 100% computerized. No one actually reads the comments. There is a computer program designed to intercept and interfere with the trades. Each EA has a certain behavior and the programs are designed to react to the EAs individuality.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
May 22, 2011 zamanından beri üye
12 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 00:23
successwsamuel posted:
WARNING DO NOT USE THINK FOREX!
I just started running a live think forex account this week using their free VPS which has an average latency of 23ms which is ok but I also am getting absolutely BS execution and mod times of 33,000!! Think forex is definitely slowing this EA down on purpose. I will modify the EA comments and magic numbers and report back with the new results.Fibo1123 posted:
I am running the 1.1.6 version live on thinkforex with a vps. Everytime it trades I get tremendous order modification times - above 2000 ms - printed on the chart.
First I though this is because of running it from my desktop, so I installed it on a VPS and it prints again the 2000-ish ms times. Then I thought it might be because of running two eas on one mt4 platform, so I left the MDP alone by itself on a separate platform, but now it does it again. I noticed this happens right after the first set of trades after installation.
I am pretty sure my latency to the broker is on average 3 ms, I measured it several times by different methods.
I also noticed that the times are getting bigger if I don't reinstall the bot and the mt4 (reinstallation of the bot only won't do) - last time it got above 10000ms, which is absurd. I am afraid this is not just a print error, but also affects the trading.
I run it with another broker live on the same vps and I have no such issues there.
I ran out of suggestions and the support seems to be clueless too. I never met a similar problem in the posts on myfxbook.
Did any of you get this problem with the bot?
I am reading about all those trades from today, but I only got 4 and the stupid message!
I am so sad, I do not know what to do... 😭😭😭
Okay, good to know I'm not alone.
I will also try this out next week and get back with results.
Money makes Money
May 22, 2011 zamanından beri üye
12 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 00:28
fughe posted:
Fibo1123 posted:
Thanks fughe,
I already asked thinkforex, they didn't have any server issues. I used the ExTest ForExpat to measure execution and it showed below 200 ms. That's why I think it's not the broker....or if it is, maybe it's something with their mt4 platform.
My four trades today were good - 3 out of 4 were on profit, but it did not continue trading like most of the accounts here (some with the same broker).
I also noticed that when MDP starts to increase the displayed times, it also prints wrong account balance - does not update with the new trades. I am more likely to believe that something is not right with the bot.
I am waiting a response from support though.
No, you don't understand. There is nothing wrong with their servers. They are intentionally causing your trading to fail. You have to call their bluff in such a way that it is in their best interest to stop causing your trades to fail. ALL mt4 brokers do this to some extent.
fughe,
I see what you mean now. I try next week and if it doesn't work, I change the broker.
Thanks for helping.
Money makes Money
Mar 16, 2011 zamanından beri üye
61 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 07:25
fughe posted:
#1- reduce the number of trades to 4 or 3 or 2 or even 1 if necessary. Keep reducing until you can get at least one good fill every time.
#2- Set 'Additional_Channels' to 8
#3- change the magic number (do this at least once every week)
#4- Change the OrderCmt (do this at least once every week)
#5- deactivate StopOrders
#6-Deactivate HardStopTrailing
#7- change TrailingResolution to 4 or 3 or possibly even 2 if the orders still fall back to a loss.
#8- If Think Forex has a forum...get on their forum and start asking for help as to why their servers have slowed down so much. Wait a couple days for a response...if no response...start a new thread and ask the same questions about their servers being slow but in a different way. Keep doing this until they respond. Make sure you state in the thread you will keep everyone posted on the progress of the problem.
If none of this works....switch brokers.
Hi Fughe - I assume that you are recommending setting the NumOrders_Level to 0? Also, why do you suggest setting the Additional_Channels to 8? Just curious. :)
If anyone knows the difference between NumOrders_Level and Additional_Channels other than what is stated in the manual then I would like to know. I have been profitable with this ea but I still don't understand the difference between these two settings.
Jun 15, 2011 zamanından beri üye
270 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 07:29
:) If u make the additional channels setting to 8, then at the same time there will be 8 orders...and the account can be blow out in minutes:))))
Jan 31, 2011 zamanından beri üye
724 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 08:22
DMFXTrader posted:
fughe posted:
#1- reduce the number of trades to 4 or 3 or 2 or even 1 if necessary. Keep reducing until you can get at least one good fill every time.
#2- Set 'Additional_Channels' to 8
#3- change the magic number (do this at least once every week)
#4- Change the OrderCmt (do this at least once every week)
#5- deactivate StopOrders
#6-Deactivate HardStopTrailing
#7- change TrailingResolution to 4 or 3 or possibly even 2 if the orders still fall back to a loss.
#8- If Think Forex has a forum...get on their forum and start asking for help as to why their servers have slowed down so much. Wait a couple days for a response...if no response...start a new thread and ask the same questions about their servers being slow but in a different way. Keep doing this until they respond. Make sure you state in the thread you will keep everyone posted on the progress of the problem.
If none of this works....switch brokers.
Hi Fughe - I assume that you are recommending setting the NumOrders_Level to 0? Also, why do you suggest setting the Additional_Channels to 8? Just curious. :)
If anyone knows the difference between NumOrders_Level and Additional_Channels other than what is stated in the manual then I would like to know. I have been profitable with this ea but I still don't understand the difference between these two settings.
You are correct. the add chan of 8 will open more trading opportunities. The num orders opens riskier trades.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
Jan 31, 2011 zamanından beri üye
724 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 08:23
mcymcy posted:
:) If u make the additional channels setting to 8, then at the same time there will be 8 orders...and the account can be blow out in minutes:))))
Wrong. the number of trades is controlled by the max trades setting.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
Mar 16, 2011 zamanından beri üye
61 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 09:27
fughe posted:
You are correct. the add chan of 8 will open more trading opportunities. The num orders opens riskier trades.
Ok - Thanks for the reply. So it is always better (unless you like risk!) to reduce the num orders before reducing the additional channels?
Maybe I need to run a backtest to see what the exact difference is!
Dec 15, 2010 zamanından beri üye
795 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 10:11
I could never get it to back test , not even once. Can you get MDP to back test?
Click on my Name to see My Live Charts and Bio.
Mar 16, 2011 zamanından beri üye
61 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 10:30
Professor53 posted:
I could never get it to back test , not even once. Can you get MDP to back test?
Yes I can using Duckascopy tick data and following Birts advice on his eareview site. I will have another go next week. :)
Jan 31, 2011 zamanından beri üye
724 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 17:28
DMFXTrader posted:
fughe posted:
You are correct. the add chan of 8 will open more trading opportunities. The num orders opens riskier trades.
Ok - Thanks for the reply. So it is always better (unless you like risk!) to reduce the num orders before reducing the additional channels?
Maybe I need to run a backtest to see what the exact difference is!
The ONLY time the num orders level should be increased above 0 is if you are always getting good fills and good closings.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
Mar 16, 2011 zamanından beri üye
61 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 18:01
fughe posted:DMFXTrader posted:The ONLY time the num orders level should be increased above 0 is if you are always getting good fills and good closings.fughe posted: You are correct. the add chan of 8 will open more trading opportunities. The num orders opens riskier trades.Ok - Thanks for the reply. So it is always better (unless you like risk!) to reduce the num orders before reducing the additional channels? Maybe I need to run a backtest to see what the exact difference is!
Interesting - thanks for the info. So if the num orders level is high does that mean the entries are made when the Market is moving very fast, so slippage could be a problem, and when the level is 0 entries are made when price is moving a bit slower?
Jan 31, 2011 zamanından beri üye
724 iletiler
Aug 28, 2011 at 23:30
DMFXTrader posted:
fughe posted:DMFXTrader posted:The ONLY time the num orders level should be increased above 0 is if you are always getting good fills and good closings.fughe posted: You are correct. the add chan of 8 will open more trading opportunities. The num orders opens riskier trades.Ok - Thanks for the reply. So it is always better (unless you like risk!) to reduce the num orders before reducing the additional channels? Maybe I need to run a backtest to see what the exact difference is!
Interesting - thanks for the info. So if the num orders level is high does that mean the entries are made when the Market is moving very fast, so slippage could be a problem, and when the level is 0 entries are made when price is moving a bit slower?
All I know is that it increases the chance that the orders will fail to be profitable.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
Nov 12, 2009 zamanından beri üye
272 iletiler
Aug 29, 2011 at 01:39
It is confusing about FxOpen because Fughe says 'My results are as good as the demo account. It is all about the setup.' But SmoothHedge says 'FXOpen ECN rejects most trading attempts by MDP. It gives Invalid Stoploss errors.'
Fughe, you recommend: #6-Deactivate HardStopTrailing. But Wakeel recommends the opposite: 'hard trailing: true'.
Thanks for further clarification.
Fughe, you recommend: #6-Deactivate HardStopTrailing. But Wakeel recommends the opposite: 'hard trailing: true'.
Thanks for further clarification.
Jan 14, 2010 zamanından beri üye
449 iletiler
Aug 29, 2011 at 02:30
(Aug 29, 2011 at 02:31 düzenlendi)
milliondpips May 25 at 23:05
In Million Dollar Pips Jun 13 at 05:22
Sure, we're almost in September and what? What does the word 'soon' means for you 😁?
Still NO LIVE ACCOUNT to show.
Oh I bet this EA doesn't really work live right? It's a good EA to show great results on demo
account and scam people 😈.
milliondpips posted:
We will be showing one in the near future.
In Million Dollar Pips Jun 13 at 05:22
milliondpips posted:
I will be releasing a live account result soon.
Sure, we're almost in September and what? What does the word 'soon' means for you 😁?
Still NO LIVE ACCOUNT to show.
Oh I bet this EA doesn't really work live right? It's a good EA to show great results on demo
account and scam people 😈.
Money makes more money $ ... $$$
