Alpha Managed Fund 1 (由 FCVAlpha)
该用户已经删除了这个系统。
Alpha Managed Fund 1讨论
Oct 06, 2013 at 17:40
895浏览
11 Replies
Oct 25, 2013 at 08:02
Sorry to tell you, but I didn't even have to look at DD or other stats, the duration is way too low, it must be arbitrage. You wouldn't open such insane lots without an absolute confidence like arbitrage.
Moreover, your broker is an unknown to me. Its website looks kinda amaterish (checking the forex account type you see a screenshot from metatrader to see the list of available pairs...). 😑
Moreover, your broker is an unknown to me. Its website looks kinda amaterish (checking the forex account type you see a screenshot from metatrader to see the list of available pairs...). 😑
A smooth sea never made a skillful sailor.
Nov 13, 2013 at 16:08
ForexPro posted:
Hiding the lot size is a NOGO! This way you don't get investors..🙄
Also it doesn't make much sens because he is showing his profit. So you see that he made 14k$ today, with 50.8 pips and 21.8 pips. You can easily deduce the lots.
The broker is either participating or its a cent account and the broker doesn't care :D
A smooth sea never made a skillful sailor.
forex_trader_95486
会员从Oct 17, 2012开始
31帖子
Nov 19, 2013 at 14:48
anybody join the PAMM program, will be interesting if its really worked. Coz broker does not provide online chat, all email, no tel numbers, nothing, only email. if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and smell like a duck.....this is beginning to smell of scam!
A bit of discussion abt them abt Dana the CEO or director being with smartfx and that smartfx has its own PAMM that runs away with ppl's $, pls contribute how u feel abt this PAMM
A bit of discussion abt them abt Dana the CEO or director being with smartfx and that smartfx has its own PAMM that runs away with ppl's $, pls contribute how u feel abt this PAMM
Nov 25, 2013 at 07:39
ymleong,
I respectfully have to disagree with your post here. I strongly suggest that you check your facts before you start slandering.
No online chat? WRONG. No telephone number? WRONG. Only emails? WRONG….In fact, the address and all information an investor/client/trader needs is on the website for all to see.
Smartfx? I have never heard of it. Alpha is not associated with Smartfx.
I don't know what the discussion is regarding Dana. But what does an employee have to do with what his employer does? You're blaming a worker for what the owners did? And its funny because people have no idea - there is a very well known Technologies company out of Boston…why don't you look there. The bottom line here is Dana is not the person you should be looking at.
Bottom line: get your facts right.
And Im sure you wrote that truly believing what you wrote. I respect that you are attempting to help people out. And thats great. But remember: the road to perdition is paved with good intentions.
In this case, I know you are incorrect. My system is obviously good. The broker is good. Both are new - yes. And if people do not like new, then fine, wait around, keep watching. Give it 12 months when everything is less new.
Time will prove everything, won't it? It always has, it always will. This case will be no different.
I respectfully have to disagree with your post here. I strongly suggest that you check your facts before you start slandering.
No online chat? WRONG. No telephone number? WRONG. Only emails? WRONG….In fact, the address and all information an investor/client/trader needs is on the website for all to see.
Smartfx? I have never heard of it. Alpha is not associated with Smartfx.
I don't know what the discussion is regarding Dana. But what does an employee have to do with what his employer does? You're blaming a worker for what the owners did? And its funny because people have no idea - there is a very well known Technologies company out of Boston…why don't you look there. The bottom line here is Dana is not the person you should be looking at.
Bottom line: get your facts right.
And Im sure you wrote that truly believing what you wrote. I respect that you are attempting to help people out. And thats great. But remember: the road to perdition is paved with good intentions.
In this case, I know you are incorrect. My system is obviously good. The broker is good. Both are new - yes. And if people do not like new, then fine, wait around, keep watching. Give it 12 months when everything is less new.
Time will prove everything, won't it? It always has, it always will. This case will be no different.
*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍，并可能导致账户终止。
提示：发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中！
提示：键入@符号，自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。
