- Domů
- Komunita
- Obchodní systémy
- Inertia Trader
Inertia Trader (Od babyjake1961)
Uživatel odstranil tento systém.
Edit Your Comment
Inertia Trader diskuse
Členem od Dec 07, 2009
134 příspěvků
Feb 03, 2017 at 14:42
Členem od Dec 07, 2009
134 příspěvků
babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
Be afraid, very afraid?
Členem od Dec 04, 2010
1447 příspěvků
Feb 04, 2017 at 01:49
Členem od Dec 04, 2010
1447 příspěvků
robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
Členem od Dec 07, 2009
134 příspěvků
Feb 04, 2017 at 17:01
Členem od Dec 07, 2009
134 příspěvků
aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Be afraid, very afraid?
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 07:34
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
SleepingFX posted:
anyone like me still have 2 open trades? I just closed one in profit.
What broker are you with?
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 07:40
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
Again, what would prevent you from using a smaller lot size if you can't stomach the bigger drawdowns?
Členem od May 08, 2012
60 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 07:56
Členem od May 08, 2012
60 příspěvků
Hi, the last 2 trades closed in loss for me. Does anyone have new open trades like this account after NFP yesterday? I got none.
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 08:09
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
Just backtest the EA with different lot sizes to determine your personal risk preferences.
Členem od May 08, 2012
60 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 12:22
Členem od May 08, 2012
60 příspěvků
babyjake1961 posted:SleepingFX posted:
anyone like me still have 2 open trades? I just closed one in profit.
What broker are you with?
Forts, (Previous: TradeFort)
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 12:25
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
SleepingFX posted:
Hi, the last 2 trades closed in loss for me. Does anyone have new open trades like this account after NFP yesterday? I got none.
Does your broker have a name?
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 12:25
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
robotchallenge posted:aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Risk preferences are a highly individual matter. We are confident about our product and trade our risk capital, so we don't mind bigger drawdowns. Quite a few EA customers like "going all in" for short-term superprofits while others trade what they can't afford to lose. As we don't know who's who, we let them pick their risk levels on their own.
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 05, 2017 at 15:53
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
SleepingFX posted:babyjake1961 posted:SleepingFX posted:
anyone like me still have 2 open trades? I just closed one in profit.
What broker are you with?
Forts, (Previous: TradeFort)
For the same results, we suggest the same broker we use (FXChoice).
Členem od Dec 04, 2010
1447 příspěvků
Feb 06, 2017 at 02:47
Členem od Dec 04, 2010
1447 příspěvků
babyjake1961 posted:It would be very useful to have a max risk per trade setting in % terms so the EA could calculate the lot size for each trade based on the hard SL. Most EAs offer a feature like this. Would save a lot of time, customers really shouldn't have to run back tests to determine lot sizing...robotchallenge posted:aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Risk preferences are a highly individual matter. We are confident about our product and trade our risk capital, so we don't mind bigger drawdowns. Quite a few EA customers like "going all in" for short-term superprofits while others trade what they can't afford to lose. As we don't know who's who, we let them pick their risk levels on their own.
Členem od Aug 16, 2016
19 příspěvků
Feb 06, 2017 at 04:45
Členem od Aug 16, 2016
19 příspěvků
To be honest, why waste time using other brokers to test or something, I am using the same brokers as the seller, and I am getting almost the same results as him.
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 06, 2017 at 07:23
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
aeronthomas posted:babyjake1961 posted:It would be very useful to have a max risk per trade setting in % terms so the EA could calculate the lot size for each trade based on the hard SL. Most EAs offer a feature like this. Would save a lot of time, customers really shouldn't have to run back tests to determine lot sizing...robotchallenge posted:aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Risk preferences are a highly individual matter. We are confident about our product and trade our risk capital, so we don't mind bigger drawdowns. Quite a few EA customers like "going all in" for short-term superprofits while others trade what they can't afford to lose. As we don't know who's who, we let them pick their risk levels on their own.
There's no hard SL here - it's set dynamically and differs from trade to trade. So what you want is not possible.
Členem od May 08, 2012
60 příspěvků
Feb 06, 2017 at 07:36
Členem od May 08, 2012
60 příspěvků
babyjake1961 posted:SleepingFX posted:
Hi, the last 2 trades closed in loss for me. Does anyone have new open trades like this account after NFP yesterday? I got none.
Does your broker have a name?
https://www.fortfs.com/
Fort Financial Services
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 06, 2017 at 08:12
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
SleepingFX posted:babyjake1961 posted:SleepingFX posted:
Hi, the last 2 trades closed in loss for me. Does anyone have new open trades like this account after NFP yesterday? I got none.
Does your broker have a name?
https://www.fortfs.com/
Fort Financial Services
We suggest using the same broker we do (FXChoice) for the same results.
Členem od Jan 30, 2016
14 příspěvků
Feb 09, 2017 at 12:42
Členem od Jan 30, 2016
14 příspěvků
Please I receive a email informing about the value of 147 usd but i checked in the site the value was 347 usd
Is not 147usd ?
Is not 147usd ?
viniciusmazzetto@
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 09, 2017 at 19:44
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
VMAZZETTO posted:
Please I receive a email informing about the value of 147 usd but i checked in the site the value was 347 usd
Is not 147usd ?
When did you receive that email?
Členem od Nov 06, 2009
44 příspěvků
Feb 09, 2017 at 21:44
Členem od Nov 06, 2009
44 příspěvků
how come you are not showing your gu version ??
i heard it runs quite well, almost better then eu.
or is it showing somewhere and i have not found it ??
i heard it runs quite well, almost better then eu.
or is it showing somewhere and i have not found it ??
fidelitasllc@
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
Feb 09, 2017 at 22:01
Členem od Mar 31, 2016
69 příspěvků
reinerh posted:
how come you are not showing your gu version ??
i heard it runs quite well, almost better then eu.
or is it showing somewhere and i have not found it ??
It's true that it's doing well but I don't run it alone on any account.
*Komerční použití a spam nebudou tolerovány a mohou vést ke zrušení účtu.
Tip: Zveřejněním adresy URL obrázku /služby YouTube se automaticky vloží do vašeho příspěvku!
Tip: Zadejte znak @, abyste automaticky vyplnili jméno uživatele, který se účastní této diskuse.