What is your most important factors when choosing signal to subscribe?

Muscat posted:
1. Proof of results
2. Customer support
3. Consistent long term results with low draw down
4. NOT martingale / grid trader
5. Method of signals (email, telegram etc)
6. Hours of trading
7. Price

Treeny posted:
I check to see if they are trying to sell me signals and if they are I run a mile...

Professional4X posted:
I honestly don't understand how anyone can be so to actually pay for a trading signal.

Signals are a waste of time and a rip off.

Why anyone would give control of their trading account to a total stranger is beyond me.

People who sell EA, Bots, and signals are bottom feeders who make money on the false hopes and dreams of others, always promising big returns, but usually only providing big losses and blown accounts.

If they were actually making a lot of money with their own trading, they wouldn't be selling their crap to other people.

Select a reputable broker with strong regulations and a guarantee of asset protections, and learn to properly trade.

JuanJoel posted:
I think that's a bold statement of yours, and I actually ponder if you've used any signal provider at all.

Bots and people who promise big returns I agree with you, those people are the ones who are trying to make a quick buck on desperate people who also want to make a quick buck, but you can't take all the people who actually try on this niche and base on 'bottom feeders'.

People who sell EA, Bots, and signals are bottom feeders who make money on the false hopes and dreams of others, always promising big returns, but usually only providing big losses and blown accounts.

Professional4X posted:

JuanJoel posted:
I think that's a bold statement of yours, and I actually ponder if you've used any signal provider at all.

Bots and people who promise big returns I agree with you, those people are the ones who are trying to make a quick buck on desperate people who also want to make a quick buck, but you can't take all the people who actually try on this niche and base on 'bottom feeders'.

I stick by my original statement.

People who sell EA, Bots, and signals are bottom feeders who make money on the false hopes and dreams of others, always promising big returns, but usually only providing big losses and blown accounts.

As a professional Quant with 30+ years of experience in the industry and more specifically the technology sector, and after having done extremely in depth analysis of thousands and thousands of signals being provided by people, I have yet to encounter a signal provider which truly lives up to the expectations of the investor or is truly able to live up to the hype that they profess to their potential clients.

I have personally tested tens of thousands of EA and similar bots on just about every type of investment terminal available, and I can say that with absolute certainty that NONE of them work over the long term because they cannot truly adapt to the vast conditional presented in the markets.

While I readily admit that there are some signals and publicly available bots that will indeed make money, in the end however 100% of them will fail and lose money because they are absolutely incapable of adjusting to the actual conditions that the market presents.

Enyinnaya posted:
So with all your experience have you developed a bot that can trade successfully in the long term?

Generous posted:
Why do people not invest in MAM's rather then signal services? Is there not a conflict of interest (paying monthly to subscribe irrelevant of the results)?