Midaz Deo
Keuntungan : | +11694.54% |
Drawdown | 9.83% |
Pip: | 5075.1 |
Perdagangan | 552 |
Menang: |
|
Rugi: |
|
Jenis: | Nyata |
Leveraj: | 1:100 |
Berdagang: | Manual |
Edit Your Comment
Midaz Deo Perbincangan
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
Nov 22, 2019 at 09:44
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
antylossgrid posted:Professional4X posted:novichekms posted:sergeyclubfx posted:
What strategy use here?
Best safe real system.
One-time open only one order, two stop-loss + reverse close.
98% profit
This system doesn't produce 98% profit. Stop lying and stop using multiple accounts to post for yourself on it.
How do you know about this?
It's a fact the system doesn't have a 98% profit ratio.
I don't have to do anything to prove my point, it's a fact and it's right there on your stats page.
Longs Won: (193/248) 77%
Shorts Won: (211/302) 69%
Using the basic math formula of: ( 77 + 69 ) / 2 = 73% average profit ratio
Basic math doesn't lie, and you shouldn't either.
Ahli sejak Aug 24, 2017
4 hantaran
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
Nov 24, 2019 at 20:51
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
Nov 24, 2019 at 21:07
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
It would be really easy to prove me absolutely wrong.
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
Nov 25, 2019 at 08:43
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
The account report you presented is absolutely NOT from this account.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/PT1319/midaz-deo/3191722
Here is absolute proof.
The report you say is from this account clearly it is from a different account.
The stats are vastly different and cannot be from the same account.
Be honest.
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
Nov 25, 2019 at 22:09
Ahli sejak Jan 05, 2016
1189 hantaran
The trader presented them as being from the account with 98% profits.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
Dec 02, 2019 at 09:51
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
Professional4X convinced me (again). The smooth growth curve is too good to be true. And that combined with the fact, that a fishy broker is involved, marks this a no-no to me.
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
Dec 24, 2019 at 16:58
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
Ahli sejak May 08, 2018
2 hantaran
Dec 27, 2019 at 05:22
Ahli sejak May 08, 2018
2 hantaran
This is very high risk. Should trade for yourself
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
Dec 27, 2019 at 08:07
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
Dec 29, 2019 at 15:52
Ahli sejak Jun 27, 2014
103 hantaran
nicolasheinekenn posted:fastdrive55 posted:Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Who called you here?
You don’t even have a real account
Yes, people sent me here... I haven't discovered this here myself.
It is not about my account. I don't sell anything and my EA is strictly private. And it is verified, btw.
Yes, I also don't trade during the X-Mas / New YEar season. But I don't disconnect my account from MyFxbook. Simple, isn't it.
Ahli sejak Oct 27, 2013
1 hantaran
Jan 07, 2020 at 19:39
(disunting Jan 07, 2020 at 19:39)
Ahli sejak Oct 27, 2013
1 hantaran
Nice
forex_trader_783914
Ahli sejak Sep 14, 2019
40 hantaran
Jan 10, 2020 at 01:07
Ahli sejak Sep 14, 2019
40 hantaran
fastdrive55 posted:You absolutely right, their system obviously dead!Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Ahli sejak Apr 06, 2018
254 hantaran
Apr 21, 2020 at 03:56
Ahli sejak Apr 06, 2018
254 hantaran
I can see these people are trying very hard to sell there EA by showing trackrecord of other people. Anyone do little research and find that these people are same selling multiple EA by showing successful trackrecord of other people.
*Penggunaan komersil dan spam tidak akan diterima, dan boleh mengakibatkan penamatan akaun.
Petua: Menyiarkan url gambar/youtube akan menyisipkannya secara automatik dalam siaran hantaran anda!
Tip: Taipkan tanda @ untuk melengkapkan nama pengguna yang menyertai perbincangan ini secara automatik.