Megadroid risk 0.2 no recovery mode (By iamfxfapturbo)
The user has deleted this strategy.
Megadroid risk 0.2 no recovery mode Обсуждение
Sep 01, 2013 at 15:52
1,160 Просмотры
8 Replies
Участник с Feb 12, 2010
12 комментариев
Feb 08, 2014 at 08:14
Hello!
I saw Your Megadroid test and was really exciting.
I have couple questions:
Each Broker are you using?
Can You explain, in 2007 didn't was on the stage this Expert advisor.
How could be the test from 2007.Or maybe with the tester?
Is this real account or demo?
Anyway thank You in advance if You want to answer.
Have a nice day!
VinnieForex
I saw Your Megadroid test and was really exciting.
I have couple questions:
Each Broker are you using?
Can You explain, in 2007 didn't was on the stage this Expert advisor.
How could be the test from 2007.Or maybe with the tester?
Is this real account or demo?
Anyway thank You in advance if You want to answer.
Have a nice day!
VinnieForex
Участник с Dec 22, 2011
18 комментариев
Feb 09, 2014 at 15:33
Hello.
The broker i use is Pepperstone.
It is a real account.
For me, i just wanted to use 5-year-data to see how the EA performs. So 2007 is not important for me at that moment.
I'm no longer use this EA and Pipjet anymore. It performs like the backtest, but sometimes, you can have three stop loss in a row and could bleed your account. It recovers, but it takes a lot of time, so this strategy is not for anyone.
To replace those EA, i have found other and i am pretty happy with my choice.
Thanks.
The broker i use is Pepperstone.
It is a real account.
For me, i just wanted to use 5-year-data to see how the EA performs. So 2007 is not important for me at that moment.
I'm no longer use this EA and Pipjet anymore. It performs like the backtest, but sometimes, you can have three stop loss in a row and could bleed your account. It recovers, but it takes a lot of time, so this strategy is not for anyone.
To replace those EA, i have found other and i am pretty happy with my choice.
Thanks.
Участник с Jun 03, 2010
696 комментариев
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:08
Model Quality 0,0% and 'Control Points only' method.
And You are telling that 'It performs like the backtest' ? Sorry, but who will believe in this? 😁
And You are telling that 'It performs like the backtest' ? Sorry, but who will believe in this? 😁
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Участник с Dec 22, 2011
18 комментариев
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:25
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really don't care if you believe in me or not.
Участник с Jun 03, 2010
696 комментариев
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:27
Ok but even for You it should be not trustful backtest due its bad accuracy.
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Участник с Dec 22, 2011
18 комментариев
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:45
And i repeat one more time:
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really don't care if you believe in me or not.
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really don't care if you believe in me or not.
Участник с Apr 05, 2012
24 комментариев
Feb 14, 2014 at 13:49
adrian point was even if just using it for yourself, Model Quality 0,0% = results mean nothing as model quality is BAD,
his only point was advising you that your test does not seem valid - EVEN if ONLY using the results for yourself.
his only point was advising you that your test does not seem valid - EVEN if ONLY using the results for yourself.
Участник с Dec 22, 2011
18 комментариев
Feb 14, 2014 at 14:06
And i repeat one more time:
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really DON'T CARE if you believe in me or not.
I did this backtest only for me, not for you or for everyone. I really DON'T CARE if you believe in me or not.
Участник с Jun 03, 2010
696 комментариев
Feb 14, 2014 at 15:35
Did he jamm himself?
dupapa - right point !
dupapa - right point !
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.
