BlueMonkey Real Money Live Test == Started Oct 2014 (By bluemonkey)
Пользователь удалил эту систему.
Edit Your Comment
BlueMonkey Real Money Live Test == Started Oct 2014 Обсуждение
Участник с Oct 18, 2011
19 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 07:22
Участник с Oct 18, 2011
19 комментариев
I also have the same problem of having different trades to master account.
Участник с May 09, 2014
4 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 07:22
Участник с May 09, 2014
4 комментариев
Clearly BlueMonkey need to explain the EA's mechanic a little bit to clarify something.
At the moment I could only assume the EA works locally, thus it analysis the market condition based on our own broker/VPS. This is the only reason I can think of that cause the differences between clients and master accounts.
However I still want a confirm from BlueMonkey that all trades are monitored by EA locally based on the open trades, and no orphan trades will be left open forever.
Somehow from this guy's account it worries me since he still has trades opened from the 9th.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx5473br/mt4-23088179/1084416/YpQvfiAwr87SpHk5YeCk
So Alex can you roughly explain how your EA works like how it open trades how it close them? I believe transparency is very important in this business.
Regards
At the moment I could only assume the EA works locally, thus it analysis the market condition based on our own broker/VPS. This is the only reason I can think of that cause the differences between clients and master accounts.
However I still want a confirm from BlueMonkey that all trades are monitored by EA locally based on the open trades, and no orphan trades will be left open forever.
Somehow from this guy's account it worries me since he still has trades opened from the 9th.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx5473br/mt4-23088179/1084416/YpQvfiAwr87SpHk5YeCk
So Alex can you roughly explain how your EA works like how it open trades how it close them? I believe transparency is very important in this business.
Regards
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 08:44
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
mt4cas posted:Good its at www.VMFX.com, it cheap and best for me.
Sorry - I have found VMFX already!
Help others
Участник с Aug 13, 2014
149 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 11:18
Участник с Aug 13, 2014
149 комментариев
good to know.. right now i'm using https://www.iwishost.com/ and I'm very happy...
I had around 6 to 8 'orphan' trades since dec-09 now I just have three.. I closed the others manually....
I had around 6 to 8 'orphan' trades since dec-09 now I just have three.. I closed the others manually....
Участник с Mar 31, 2014
192 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 12:07
Участник с Mar 31, 2014
192 комментариев
ohhh...whats going on with the EUR/USD???
ben@
forex_trader_169333
Участник с Dec 26, 2013
62 комментариев
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 12:54
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
I have 6 trades active and BMEA master has 5 trades active, I do not which one is orphan! and to be closed manually.
Help others
Участник с Oct 16, 2014
12 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 14:41
Участник с Oct 16, 2014
12 комментариев
whiteboy posted:
I also have the same problem of having different trades to master account.
Not the first one who says that.
So i really believe, that performance is from different EA or with manual intervention.
There are only a few EA's which really works now.
It's like my hobby to test them..
Some of them works, some fail sooner or later.
Regards,
John
The best way to avoid overtrading is to realise that playing the forex markets is a marathon, rather than a sprint.
Участник с Jun 25, 2011
69 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 15:03
Участник с Jun 25, 2011
69 комментариев
@JohnMelvin I don't think there is any manual intervention, the problem is master account take much more pips than clients (strange is not contrary 😈), they said some funny non sense about broker but is clear there is some else
Also the fact that is not possible produce any backtest look suspicious.
Cheers.
Also the fact that is not possible produce any backtest look suspicious.
Cheers.
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 15:35
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
jhnnavoigh posted:Hi,
@JohnMelvin I don't think there is any manual intervention, the problem is master account take much more pips than clients (strange is not contrary 😈), they said some funny non sense about broker but is clear there is some else
Also the fact that is not possible produce any backtest look suspicious.
Cheers.
I agree with you. The vendor who does not refund or help in making it profitable is supposed to be treated as a scammer. I had purchased this EA long back and faced all terrible situations. That is reason I am using it in demo only. Buyers be aware!!!
Help others
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 16:07
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
thesupremeforex posted:jhnnavoigh posted:Hi,
@JohnMelvin I don't think there is any manual intervention, the problem is master account take much more pips than clients (strange is not contrary 😈), they said some funny non sense about broker but is clear there is some else
Also the fact that is not possible produce any backtest look suspicious.
Cheers.
I agree with you. The vendor who does not refund or help in making it profitable is supposed to be treated as a scammer. I had purchased this EA long back and faced all terrible situations. That is reason I am using it in demo only. Buyers be aware!!!
This is not true. we have helped and will help all customers to setup the EA and to make sure it works for them.
A
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 16:16
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
jhnnavoigh posted:
@JohnMelvin I don't think there is any manual intervention, the problem is master account take much more pips than clients (strange is not contrary 😈), they said some funny non sense about broker but is clear there is some else
Also the fact that is not possible produce any backtest look suspicious.
Cheers.
The client and master trades almost the same. you have to consider this is not a trade copier. this is an EA and the calculations would take in different parameters from one account to another. there for there would be minor differences but the overall results would be the same.
A
Участник с Jun 25, 2011
69 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 16:22
Участник с Jun 25, 2011
69 комментариев
@bluemonkey 100/200 pips difference is not a minor difference sorry.
I think you have a good strategy, although is high risk/high reward, but is poorly coded and full of bugs. Also you really must work on customer care Alex.
Cheers.
I think you have a good strategy, although is high risk/high reward, but is poorly coded and full of bugs. Also you really must work on customer care Alex.
Cheers.
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 16:41
Участник с Apr 25, 2014
249 комментариев
bluemonkey posted:But customers says you are not helping and making EA profitable. Setting is not difficult at all. Its common sense to set it as per instruction but making it profitable, not leaving orphan trades is not resolve by you at all. This scam created by you as you do not refund not make it profitable and manipulating the master account and cheating customers.thesupremeforex posted:jhnnavoigh posted:Hi,
@JohnMelvin I don't think there is any manual intervention, the problem is master account take much more pips than clients (strange is not contrary 😈), they said some funny non sense about broker but is clear there is some else
Also the fact that is not possible produce any backtest look suspicious.
Cheers.
I agree with you. The vendor who does not refund or help in making it profitable is supposed to be treated as a scammer. I had purchased this EA long back and faced all terrible situations. That is reason I am using it in demo only. Buyers be aware!!!
This is not true. we have helped and will help all customers to setup the EA and to make sure it works for them.
A
Help others
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 17:04
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
jhnnavoigh posted:
@bluemonkey 100/200 pips difference is not a minor difference sorry.
I think you have a good strategy, although is high risk/high reward, but is poorly coded and full of bugs. Also you really must work on customer care Alex.
Cheers.
yes, thats exactly right, i would like to see your account and that way will be able to give u a full investigation as to what has caused the problem.
A
Участник с Apr 05, 2012
26 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 17:51
Участник с Apr 05, 2012
26 комментариев
Hi Everyone,
I just received the EA over the past weekend and have got ver. 1.1. Not sure if there is a difference in the later versions, but I know he is still handing out v.1.1 so it can't be that big a difference. My question is for everyone inquiring about orphaned trades. Why do you believe these trades have been orphaned? Is the only proof you have because of the 'master account,' which we now know is not a master account or do you have other evidence? Are you looking at the details on chart? Just wondering because orphaned trades can be very dangerous and will definitely influence whether I continue to use this EA. Thanks.
I just received the EA over the past weekend and have got ver. 1.1. Not sure if there is a difference in the later versions, but I know he is still handing out v.1.1 so it can't be that big a difference. My question is for everyone inquiring about orphaned trades. Why do you believe these trades have been orphaned? Is the only proof you have because of the 'master account,' which we now know is not a master account or do you have other evidence? Are you looking at the details on chart? Just wondering because orphaned trades can be very dangerous and will definitely influence whether I continue to use this EA. Thanks.
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 17:55
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
wmoody posted:
Hi Everyone,
I just received the EA over the past weekend and have got ver. 1.1. Not sure if there is a difference in the later versions, but I know he is still handing out v.1.1 so it can't be that big a difference. My question is for everyone inquiring about orphaned trades. Why do you believe these trades have been orphaned? Is the only proof you have because of the 'master account,' which we now know is not a master account or do you have other evidence? Are you looking at the details on chart? Just wondering because orphaned trades can be very dangerous and will definitely influence whether I continue to use this EA. Thanks.
well said, what you call master account is not a master account. it is just an account that the EA is running on it for test.
also you have to consider the EA looks at previous trades before opening new ones and if there is a minor difference in the first one, it will carry it all the way for all trades. that said, i have mentioned time and time again, the overall results will be the same.
A
Участник с Apr 20, 2013
167 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 18:19
Участник с Apr 20, 2013
167 комментариев
I understand that people are worried that trades are NOT EXACTLY matching with the master account displayed here and extra trades are being called as 'Orphaned Trades'.
Honestly, they are NOT orphaned trades. Orphaned trades are those that the EA doesn't know about and won't control or manage it.
Right now, I have 6 SELL EUR/USD trades open and the master account here only has 5. Which according to people here, is ONE ORPHANED TRADE. This isn't an orphaned trade because the EA knows about it and is managing it.
Check my screenshot, and the BlueMonkey EA does display 6 trades. If it displayed 5 trades, and 6 were open, then yes, one of them is indeed an orphan and I would be worried. The differences are due to different brokers, latency and slippage.
Hope I explained it well.
Honestly, they are NOT orphaned trades. Orphaned trades are those that the EA doesn't know about and won't control or manage it.
Right now, I have 6 SELL EUR/USD trades open and the master account here only has 5. Which according to people here, is ONE ORPHANED TRADE. This isn't an orphaned trade because the EA knows about it and is managing it.
Check my screenshot, and the BlueMonkey EA does display 6 trades. If it displayed 5 trades, and 6 were open, then yes, one of them is indeed an orphan and I would be worried. The differences are due to different brokers, latency and slippage.
Hope I explained it well.
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 20:29
(отредактировано Dec 16, 2014 at 20:33)
Участник с Jun 22, 2014
423 комментариев
============ ANNOUNCEMENT
============ ANNOUNCEMENT
============ ANNOUNCEMENT
============ ANNOUNCEMENT
@fx5473br and I are running massive tests to see how we can further optimize the EA and solve the problems if any.
he will be given as many accounts as he wants on any broker and will run numerous test.
we will monitor all tests on myfxbook so you can all see.
let me or @fx5473br know if you have any questions.
A
============ ANNOUNCEMENT
============ ANNOUNCEMENT
============ ANNOUNCEMENT
@fx5473br and I are running massive tests to see how we can further optimize the EA and solve the problems if any.
he will be given as many accounts as he wants on any broker and will run numerous test.
we will monitor all tests on myfxbook so you can all see.
let me or @fx5473br know if you have any questions.
A
Участник с Aug 13, 2014
149 комментариев
Dec 16, 2014 at 20:34
Участник с Aug 13, 2014
149 комментариев
Guys, I had some big differences on my account like the others... Alex from bluemonkey has my vps details and he's investigating... beside of that he gave me few more instances and I'm enabled in some other brokers to compare...
Right now We're testing ironfx real, demo and i'm installing in a demo account at FXCM (bluemonkey real account)
thanks
Right now We're testing ironfx real, demo and i'm installing in a demo account at FXCM (bluemonkey real account)
thanks
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.