Client $6k 1x risk Varianse ECNpro (By FxMasterGuru)

Пользователь удалил эту систему.

Client $6k 1x risk Varianse ECNpro Обсуждение

Nov 10, 2016 at 22:39
611 Просмотры
12 Replies
Участник с Dec 04, 2010   1557 комментариев
Jan 11, 2017 at 11:11
FxMasterGuru, do you feel liquidity and normal spreads have returned back to the market now? I see over the end of December period performance suffered with these factors...
Участник с May 04, 2012   1608 комментариев
Jan 11, 2017 at 11:25 (отредактировано Jan 11, 2017 at 11:26)
It was unfortunate for this client to double up his account risk just days before the massive DD, which was obviously due to Holiday season related low liquidity and lack of 'big players' on the Asian session markets. Probably those 'big players' were already playing on the plush ski-resorts of Aspen, Davos and St. Moritz at that time... Lesson has been learned for next year.

My steady 1x risk REFERENCE ACCOUNT gives a more realistic picture of the strategy's performance at an A-booking pure STP/DMA broker: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/FxMasterGuru/robosniper-1x-risk-reference-account/1883830

In summary: December was closed with 8% gain and January is already up with +4% profit.

To answer your question: Yes, Asian session liquidity and the 'big players' (whose footsteps the strategy is following) seem to be returning, although slowly. In regard to spreads, I have not noticed major changes at my broker over the past weeks, except for the (22:00:00 GMT) daily rollover related spread spikes which were more frequent in early and mid-December.
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Участник с Dec 04, 2010   1557 комментариев
Jan 11, 2017 at 11:42
Thanks I am just wondering if should turn my other EAs back on yet or wait till next week... cheers mate
profixtr
forex_trader_390729
Участник с Jan 08, 2017   21 комментариев
Jan 11, 2017 at 14:47
FxMasterGuru posted:

Guru for LOSS
Участник с May 04, 2012   1608 комментариев
Jan 11, 2017 at 15:39
profixtr posted:
FxMasterGuru posted:

Guru for LOSS

@profixtr

Thanks for your sharing constructive insight! 😀

If you had read the above post of mine carefully you would be aware that my strategy has been profitable each and every month since August 2016. But apparently my post was too long for you read...

Anyway, I see that you have just re-registered with a different user name on MyFxBook, and one of your first actions was to attack me, which means that you must be one of the scammers I have put out of business...
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Участник с Oct 17, 2016   9 комментариев
Jan 12, 2017 at 08:04
@aeronthomas

Grid Trading.....
This trader is desperate to minimize his losses.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/FxMasterGuru/client-6k-1x-risk-varianse/1855457



This desperation can lead to further losses.
Try to control your emotions and things will be fine gradually.

Приложения:

Time is Money
Участник с Dec 04, 2010   1557 комментариев
Jan 12, 2017 at 09:41
that doesn't mean grid trading necessarily. It's just 2 open trades on the same pair simultaneously. If I saw 5-6 trades opened at the one time maybe, but not 2 trades...
Участник с May 04, 2012   1608 комментариев
Jan 12, 2017 at 10:12 (отредактировано Jan 12, 2017 at 10:28)
daily5percent posted:
@aeronthomas

Grid Trading.....
This trader is desperate to minimize his losses.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/FxMasterGuru/client-6k-1x-risk-varianse/1855457



This desperation can lead to further losses.
Try to control your emotions and things will be fine gradually.

@daily5percent

Thanks for your observations.

Based on back and forward test results - ON CERTAIN PAIRS, like on AUDNZD - the EA performs better by dividing the STANDARD position sizes into TWO PORTIONS.

As you have failed to notice on your posted screenshot the AUDCAD trade size is 0.87 lot. This 0.87 lot size would be the STANDARD trade size of the AUDNZD trade, too.

But - based on the above principle - instead of trading it as a WHOLE 0.87 lot on AUDNZD, I have DIVIDED IT INTO TWO SEPARATE 0.43-0.44 lot orders. In summary: the total exposure on both pairs is EXACTLY THE SAME. So there is no 'desperation', but SMART POSITION SIZING.

Capice...?

I am against GRIDS and MARTINGALES and I have been pinpointing such deficiencies in other strategies for years. Why would I do the same exact thing and displaying it publicly...?

@daily5percent AGAIN:

Please ASK FIRST before showing off how ignorant you are in reading and understanding Trade History correctly.

P.S. Nevertheless, you would be right about 'GRID' if I used the same lot sizes on AUDNZD as on AUDCAD.

Приложения:

Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Участник с May 04, 2012   1608 комментариев
Jan 12, 2017 at 10:21 (отредактировано Jan 12, 2017 at 10:40)
profixtr posted:
FxMasterGuru posted:

Guru for LOSS

@profixtr

This is the account of an investor who had DOUBLED his RISK SETTING just before the Holiday Season drawdown. His timing was really unfortunate and so this account does not reflect the true nature of the EA. But I have not deleted it as ''it is life'', showing ''Murphy's Law'' in action when RISK SETTING is increased too fast.

My personal CONSISTENTLY 1x risk REFERENCE ACCOUNT is the real reflection of what the EA does. This REFERENCE ACCOUNT was profitable in December at +8% and it is already in profit for January at +4.75%:

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/FxMasterGuru/robosniper-1x-risk-reference-account/1883830

Also, my ICM account with the same EA has closed August, September and November in profit when I moved my funds over to VARIANSE due to excessive slippages and spread increases noticed at ICM, probably due to their virtual dealer plugins interfering with the EA. Being B-booked by ICM (i.e. they take the other side of my trades in-house) their desperate 'virtual dealer plugin' revenge is understandable, even though not acceptable.

@profixtr AGAIN: I am puzzled by your malicious statement... Apparently you are a newbie who registered just a few days ago on MyFxBook, and it was a pretty bold action from a newbie to attack the most Vouched member of the MyFxBook community with such a blatant statement... So for that reason: ''You are fired!''
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Участник с Oct 17, 2016   9 комментариев
Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42
@FxMasterGuru

Come on guru. you can call it what ever you want but it is GRID... GRID... GRID.

You gotta admit it. You don't know how to trade. You are losing your clients money and giving some bullshit type explanation???



Time is Money
Участник с May 04, 2012   1608 комментариев
Jan 13, 2017 at 17:14 (отредактировано Jan 13, 2017 at 17:14)
Участник с Dec 28, 2016   20 комментариев
Jan 30, 2017 at 13:48

Blocked Users: 24

Track Record Not Verified
Участник с May 04, 2012   1608 комментариев
Jan 30, 2017 at 14:19
Recently MyFxBook's verification system had some glitches, as I have pointed it out in other threads and for that reason I had to reload and re-verify two of my reference accounts (0.5x and 1x risk). This one will be the next so you can come back and see that it is verified. If you do not believe it, please contact MyFxBook Customer Support.

As I have also pointed it out for you in the thread of my 1x risk account:

I am the most Vouched Scam Hunter on MyFxBook for years and many of those exposed scammers have started a smear campaign, incl. extortion against me, so I had no choice but to block them.

Still, my ratio is pretty good:

Vouches: 31
Blocked Users: 24

Sorry, Marus, it is 25 now... 😀
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.