- Trang chủ
- Cộng đồng
- Nhà giao dịch mới
- Do you prefer fixed spreads or dynamic spreads?
Edit Your Comment
Do you prefer fixed spreads or dynamic spreads?
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
Aug 27, 2012 at 07:53
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
Hey guys,
do you prefer fixed spreads or do you prefer dynamic spreads? What does your broker offer you?
Thanks for taking time to respond.
do you prefer fixed spreads or do you prefer dynamic spreads? What does your broker offer you?
Thanks for taking time to respond.
Pax puts the X in Forex.
forex_trader_79941
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
Aug 27, 2012 at 09:00
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
ECN Account
- slippage + Comission + var Spread
it is better to trade with
- 4 digit or 5 digit fix spread NDD broker
variable spread is a big trap for EA s to fail.
better to trade with fix spread. ( 4-5 weeks ago I was on the other side )
walker
- slippage + Comission + var Spread
it is better to trade with
- 4 digit or 5 digit fix spread NDD broker
variable spread is a big trap for EA s to fail.
better to trade with fix spread. ( 4-5 weeks ago I was on the other side )
walker
Tham gia từ Aug 17, 2012
10bài viết
Tham gia từ Jan 31, 2012
168bài viết
Aug 28, 2012 at 07:11
Tham gia từ Jan 31, 2012
168bài viết
malkaby85 posted:
fix spread of course 😀
it all depends on the trading strategy you are using
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Aug 28, 2012 at 14:49
(đã sửa Aug 28, 2012 at 14:50)
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
TheLastBear posted:
Hey guys,
do you prefer fixed spreads or do you prefer dynamic spreads? What does your broker offer you?
Thanks for taking time to respond.
A great question. I was sure dynamic spreads are best, until I read walker's response.
I do think fixed spreads is the more transparent approach broker's wise, as many traders overlook or don't understand the commission factor. However, with most brokers changing their model from fixed to variable+commission model, the costs per trade went straight down. By my calculations, spreads with a commission model are cheaper than fixed spreads.
For example (please correct me if I'm wrong), if a commission is $2.5 per 1 lot per turn, and the initial spread is 0.5, then openning and closing a trade of 1 lot would cost 0.5pip*2+($2.5*2) = $5*2 + $5 = $15 or 1.5 pips. Divided by 2, this makes a spread of 0.75 only. Anything above that number with a fixed spread is more expensive (fixed spread usually start from 1.5 pips).
forex_trader_79941
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
Aug 28, 2012 at 15:02
(đã sửa Aug 28, 2012 at 15:02)
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
one Q
one input
why you divided it by 2 ?
calculate slippage %90 negative and starting from 0.5 to >5 pips sometimes
on the other hand variable spread is a big trap for fail EA s. EA s programmed for doing always the same. when EA work with variable spread broker it has much more fail poss then working with fix spread.
walker
one input
why you divided it by 2 ?
calculate slippage %90 negative and starting from 0.5 to >5 pips sometimes
on the other hand variable spread is a big trap for fail EA s. EA s programmed for doing always the same. when EA work with variable spread broker it has much more fail poss then working with fix spread.
walker
James_Bond posted:TheLastBear posted:
Hey guys,
do you prefer fixed spreads or do you prefer dynamic spreads? What does your broker offer you?
Thanks for taking time to respond.
A great question. I was sure dynamic spreads are best, until I read walker's response.
I do think fixed spreads is the more transparent approach broker's wise, as many traders overlook or don't understand the commission factor. However, with most brokers changing their model from fixed to variable+commission model, the costs per trade went straight down. By my calculations, spreads with a commission model are cheaper than fixed spreads.
For example (please correct me if I'm wrong), if a commission is $2.5 per 1 lot per turn, and the initial spread is 0.5, then openning and closing a trade of 1 lot would cost 0.5pip*2+($2.5*2) = $5*2 + $5 = $15 or 1.5 pips. Divided by 2, this makes a spread of 0.75 only. Anything above that number with a fixed spread is more expensive (fixed spread usually start from 1.5 pips).
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Aug 29, 2012 at 12:22
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
stevewalker posted:
one Q
one input
why you divided it by 2 ?
Because a the spread is for one way trade, ie buy. If you wish to close it (ie sell), that is another spread cost. Actually, I could have counted it for one way only, instead of counting round trip and then dividing it 🙄.
As to slippage - I'm assuming it is the same for fixed and variable, or am I wrong here?
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
Aug 29, 2012 at 12:39
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
I have to agree with Moreno Rodrigez, it all depends on your trading strategy. While EA's may under-perform with dynamic spreads, active traders may not. I am not a fan of EA's so that would not account. I myself have not decided if I would prefer a fixed spread over a dynamic spread.
Pax puts the X in Forex.
forex_trader_79941
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
Aug 29, 2012 at 14:08
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
we are calculating the cost.
according to my calculations, including slippage, fix spread is better then variable spread.
bigger the spread smaller the slippage
also with most of the brokers trader can limit slippage with instant order execution.
with ECN market order execution trade can slip as much as it can sometimes > 30 pips.
also variable spread is another ( name on it ) variable that trader can not control.
every variable out of trader control runs against trader
walker
according to my calculations, including slippage, fix spread is better then variable spread.
bigger the spread smaller the slippage
also with most of the brokers trader can limit slippage with instant order execution.
with ECN market order execution trade can slip as much as it can sometimes > 30 pips.
also variable spread is another ( name on it ) variable that trader can not control.
every variable out of trader control runs against trader
walker
James_Bond posted:stevewalker posted:
one Q
one input
why you divided it by 2 ?
Because a the spread is for one way trade, ie buy. If you wish to close it (ie sell), that is another spread cost. Actually, I could have counted it for one way only, instead of counting round trip and then dividing it 🙄.
As to slippage - I'm assuming it is the same for fixed and variable, or am I wrong here?
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Aug 29, 2012 at 14:47
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
stevewalker posted:
bigger the spread smaller the slippage
I think this is not a plus but a minus - most of the cost is built into the high spread - since the large part of slippage occurs (or should at least) during an economic event and since most of the time there aren't any events, the trader keeps paying a high spread for his trades.
forex_trader_79941
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
Aug 29, 2012 at 14:54
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
you think so
have you ever record your slippage😀
have you ever record your slippage😀
James_Bond posted:stevewalker posted:
bigger the spread smaller the slippage
I think this is not a plus but a minus - most of the cost is built into the high spread - since the large part of slippage occurs (or should at least) during an economic event and since most of the time there aren't any events, the trader keeps paying a high spread for his trades.
forex_trader_80622
Tham gia từ Jun 11, 2012
21bài viết
Aug 30, 2012 at 11:20
Tham gia từ Jun 11, 2012
21bài viết
Dynamic Spread in my opinion is the way. It also gives you a good idea if there is movement in the market.
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
Aug 31, 2012 at 12:53
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
So far I have stuck with dynamic spreads and I can't really complain.
Pax puts the X in Forex.
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Sep 06, 2012 at 15:10
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Besides the spread you see, you should also check the actual spread received. I saw somewhere a broker showing once price on the chart, but when you execute a trade, you get another.
forex_trader_79941
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
Sep 12, 2012 at 17:34
Tham gia từ Jun 06, 2012
1439bài viết
once I had coded an EA & testing it. I added a spread rescue. if spread goes above lets say 6 pips it was closing trades.
then EA started to close trades cont.
I recoreded the spread and see that sometimes spread is >20 pips. but eye can not catch it
wierd
walker
then EA started to close trades cont.
I recoreded the spread and see that sometimes spread is >20 pips. but eye can not catch it
wierd
walker
James_Bond posted:
Besides the spread you see, you should also check the actual spread received. I saw somewhere a broker showing once price on the chart, but when you execute a trade, you get another.
Tham gia từ May 30, 2012
134bài viết
Sep 14, 2012 at 13:47
Tham gia từ May 30, 2012
134bài viết
I use fixed spreads,
just because it was easyer to program in my ea's,
also havent gotten signs of any severe slippage.
It also suits my trading style the best.
The choice is personal.
as long as i'm getting profits and get payed out I'm not complaining.
Opened an account through a rebate IB which gives me part of the spread.
So my opinion is fixed spread all the way :)
just because it was easyer to program in my ea's,
also havent gotten signs of any severe slippage.
It also suits my trading style the best.
The choice is personal.
as long as i'm getting profits and get payed out I'm not complaining.
Opened an account through a rebate IB which gives me part of the spread.
So my opinion is fixed spread all the way :)
I am the change in the market that causes you to lose :p / Watch out before I negative pip you! ^^
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
Sep 14, 2012 at 18:42
Tham gia từ Jul 03, 2012
186bài viết
I agree, the choice is personal and comes down to strategy.
Pax puts the X in Forex.
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Oct 16, 2012 at 10:02
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Aren't fixed spread a clear sign of a bucket shop? Obviously, brokers cannot offer a fixed spread when connected to the interbank markets as the spread always changes due to supply and demand, just like prices.
Tham gia từ May 30, 2012
134bài viết
Oct 16, 2012 at 10:24
Tham gia từ May 30, 2012
134bài viết
James_Bond posted:
Aren't fixed spread a clear sign of a bucket shop? Obviously, brokers cannot offer a fixed spread when connected to the interbank markets as the spread always changes due to supply and demand, just like prices.
yeah, you could see it that way.
I think the big fixed spreads are so they get a big piece of the money pie, no matter the spread variations, to make sure they got their pockets filled no matter how good/bad the excecution..
I am the change in the market that causes you to lose :p / Watch out before I negative pip you! ^^
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Oct 16, 2012 at 11:07
Tham gia từ Jan 14, 2010
556bài viết
Financialarts posted:James_Bond posted:
Aren't fixed spread a clear sign of a bucket shop? Obviously, brokers cannot offer a fixed spread when connected to the interbank markets as the spread always changes due to supply and demand, just like prices.
yeah, you could see it that way.
I think the big fixed spreads are so they get a big piece of the money pie, no matter the spread variations, to make sure they got their pockets filled no matter how good/bad the excecution..
That's what I thought. And when the spread is actually higher than what they show you, they just requote you until spread gets back to normal - I don't see how a fixed spread can be better than variable in any scenario.
*Nghiêm cấm sử dụng cho mục đích thương mại và spam, nếu vi phạm có thể dẫn đến việc chấm dứt tài khoản.
Mẹo: Đăng ảnh/url youtube sẽ tự động được nhúng vào bài viết của bạn!
Mẹo: Dùng @ để tự động điền tên người dùng tham gia vào cuộc thảo luận này.