IS White EA (Genom InvestSniper )
| Förstärkning : | +3.29M% |
| Uttag | 0.93% |
| Pips: | 908123.0 |
| Trades | 6520 |
| Won: |
|
| Förlorad: |
|
| Modell Kvalitet: | 99.9% |
| Staplar i testet: | 142106 |
| Modellerade fästingar: | 45918224 |
IS White EA Diskussion
I actually paid the author to get the source codes for several of these EAs, and that’s how I found out what’s really going on. The backtests look amazing because they’re run as “strategies” in MT4, and the code is full of look-ahead tricks — it can see future prices, so of course the results look perfect. But when you run the same thing as a real system on a live account, performance crashes, drawdown goes through the roof, and you just lose money. They’re selling a dream built on fake tests. Don’t trust the glossy charts: a strategy on paper is not the same as a system in real trading.
DiegoP23 posted:I actually paid the author to get the source codes for several of these EAs, and that’s how I found out what’s really going on. The backtests look amazing because they’re run as “strategies” in MT4, and the code is full of look-ahead tricks — it can see future prices, so of course the results look perfect. But when you run the same thing as a real system on a live account, performance crashes, drawdown goes through the roof, and you just lose money. They’re selling a dream built on fake tests. Don’t trust the glossy charts: a strategy on paper is not the same as a system in real trading.
Hey so actually yeah that would almost be the case but heres what happens for the most part: - they are not tested on real ticks ( no spread no slippage and diffrent prices then brokers)
- and the most important thing is that they over optimize them for a certian period of time to get these nice results.
