IS White EA (에 의해 InvestSniper )
| : 게인 | +3.29M% | 
| 드로다운 | 0.93% | 
| 핍스: | 908123.0 | 
| 거래 | 6520 | 
| 원 : | 
                                     | 
                            
| 손실: | 
                                     | 
                            
| 모델 품질 : | 99.9% | 
| 테스트 막대: | 142106 | 
| : 모델링된 틱 | 45918224 | 
IS White EA 토론
I actually paid the author to get the source codes for several of these EAs, and that’s how I found out what’s really going on. The backtests look amazing because they’re run as “strategies” in MT4, and the code is full of look-ahead tricks — it can see future prices, so of course the results look perfect. But when you run the same thing as a real system on a live account, performance crashes, drawdown goes through the roof, and you just lose money. They’re selling a dream built on fake tests. Don’t trust the glossy charts: a strategy on paper is not the same as a system in real trading.
DiegoP23 posted:I actually paid the author to get the source codes for several of these EAs, and that’s how I found out what’s really going on. The backtests look amazing because they’re run as “strategies” in MT4, and the code is full of look-ahead tricks — it can see future prices, so of course the results look perfect. But when you run the same thing as a real system on a live account, performance crashes, drawdown goes through the roof, and you just lose money. They’re selling a dream built on fake tests. Don’t trust the glossy charts: a strategy on paper is not the same as a system in real trading.
Hey so actually yeah that would almost be the case but heres what happens for the most part: - they are not tested on real ticks ( no spread no slippage and diffrent prices then brokers)
- and the most important thing is that they over optimize them for a certian period of time to get these nice results.