Deviator (By deviator)
Gain : | +150.36% |
Drawdown | 75.94% |
Pips: | 21810.8 |
Trades | 924 |
Won: |
|
Lost: |
|
Type: | Demo |
Leverage: | 1:200 |
Trading: | Automated |
Edit Your Comment
Deviator Discussion
Apr 08, 2010 at 07:51
(edited Apr 08, 2010 at 07:52)
Member Since Apr 07, 2010
5 posts
Deviator EA always opens two orders and when sum of them is in profit it closes them both, so usually one order is in profit and the other one is in loss, altogether giving some profit. It is similar principle like famous EURUSD/USDCHF so called 'hedging' (which does not work in the long run) but I use different principle which leads me to the profitable system.
It is a commercial system.
Everybody welcome to take a look!
It is a commercial system.
Everybody welcome to take a look!
Member Since Apr 20, 2010
814 posts
May 07, 2010 at 11:29
Member Since Apr 20, 2010
814 posts
Why is that one pair lot size is x2 bigger than other pairs ?
And the bigger lot size pair always has negative pip.
While the smaller lot size pair always has positive pip double than the negative pip.
Is there a way to reverse the lot size of the pair, so it gain more profit ?
So the EA will received the signal to auto trade and we can not control the lot size?
And the bigger lot size pair always has negative pip.
While the smaller lot size pair always has positive pip double than the negative pip.
Is there a way to reverse the lot size of the pair, so it gain more profit ?
So the EA will received the signal to auto trade and we can not control the lot size?
Information is Gold when come to organised.
May 07, 2010 at 11:40
(edited May 07, 2010 at 11:41)
Member Since Apr 07, 2010
5 posts
ForexSeeker posted:That is my strategy. It is a kind of hedging. One pair moves more-less twice as much as the other.
Why is that one pair lot size is x2 bigger than other pairs ?
There are always two orders open at the same time. If the sum of both reaches my profit target then I close them both - with overall profit, where one can be negative and the other one positive, but positive must be bigger than negative, obviously.
And the bigger lot size pair always has negative pip.
Does not matter which one wins, the sum of both orders PL must be my profit target - positive.
While the smaller lot size pair always has positive pip double than the negative pip.
No, this is my strategy. If you want it to work better, maybe develop your own strategy.
Is there a way to reverse the lot size of the pair, so it gain more profit ?
You can control lot size by setting the lot multiplier factor, e.g. if I have 0.1 lot and your lot multiplier factor is 0.2, then EA opens on your account 0.1 * 0.2 lot = 0.05 lot
So the EA will received the signal to auto trade and we can not control the lot size?
Member Since Jan 18, 2010
63 posts
Member Since Apr 20, 2010
814 posts
May 09, 2010 at 00:00
(edited May 09, 2010 at 00:00)
Member Since Apr 20, 2010
814 posts
??? Correlation strategies got anything to do with spread ??
Only scalping EA that close at small pip or abrigate Ea that stealing 1 or 2 pip only depend on spread.
If you talking about logic trigger affected by spread ? This EA logic not even run on your PC, it just received signal form the master to open trade and close trade.
The only doubt is that can it execute the command as fast as the master ? Surely a fast action take profit EA is unable to use in rent a signal EA.
Only scalping EA that close at small pip or abrigate Ea that stealing 1 or 2 pip only depend on spread.
If you talking about logic trigger affected by spread ? This EA logic not even run on your PC, it just received signal form the master to open trade and close trade.
The only doubt is that can it execute the command as fast as the master ? Surely a fast action take profit EA is unable to use in rent a signal EA.
Information is Gold when come to organised.
*Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.