Inertia Trader (By babyjake1961)
The user has deleted this system.
Inertia Trader Discussion
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Dec 16, 2016 at 09:11
I am also running a tick-level backtest on this EA for 2016...
It is has been running for 12 hours now and still crunching price data of November...
Full report will follow. (Hint: It looks good.)
It is has been running for 12 hours now and still crunching price data of November...
Full report will follow. (Hint: It looks good.)
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Member Since Dec 04, 2010
1557 posts
Dec 16, 2016 at 09:17
FxMasterGuru posted:will be very interested to see these results also. You using tickstory tick data?
I am also running a tick-level backtest on this EA for 2016...
It is has been running for 12 hours now and still crunching price data of November...
Full report will follow. (Hint: It looks good.)
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Dec 18, 2016 at 08:17
Here it is with TickStory tick data (using 1 pip EURUSD spread):
Attachments:
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
forex_trader_29148
Member Since Feb 11, 2011
1916 posts
Dec 18, 2016 at 08:29
ok retract myself ..will watch it
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Dec 19, 2016 at 07:29
As a customer I have installed Inertia Trader EA on a $1000 funded VERIFIED Live ECNpro account at the London based and FCA regulated VARIANSE broker.
Anyone who is interested in the performance of this verified live account can find the link to it in my MyFxBook profile.
(Open Trades are hidden assuming that the seller does not want them to be displayed for non-customers.)
Anyone who is interested in the performance of this verified live account can find the link to it in my MyFxBook profile.
(Open Trades are hidden assuming that the seller does not want them to be displayed for non-customers.)
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Dec 19, 2016 at 07:44
@FxMasterGuru I may be asking the wrong question, But this test you made in a Demo account right?! Is there any difference from a real account for Strategy Tester?
Is the TickStory the best data? I never heard about.. .thanks for sharing this with us
Is the TickStory the best data? I never heard about.. .thanks for sharing this with us
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Dec 19, 2016 at 08:45
ironpips posted:
@FxMasterGuru I may be asking the wrong question, But this test you made in a Demo account right?! Is there any difference from a real account for Strategy Tester?
Is the TickStory the best data? I never heard about.. .thanks for sharing this with us
@ironpips
Well, TickStory is the only reliable, relatively low cost and easy to use backtester software I know. It uses Dukascopy's free price data.
Whether you do a TickStory backtest on a real or a demo account it does not matter as TickStory uses Duscascopy's M1 historical data and makes ''intelligent guesses'' about likely intra-candle price movement. So for tick-scalper EAs it is less accurate, but for strategies with an average win and loss > 10 pips, it is reasonably accurate, but still LESS than a DEMO forward test.
Of course, by recording on MT4 each and every tick the market produces and running an EA backtest on these self-recorded data would be more accurate than Dusascopy's M1 data, but running a backtest on EACH AND EVERY TICK the market had produces would extend the running time of a backtest by 100x or 1000x which would unrealistic. Running the Inertia Trader backtest on 2016's M1 data took 14+ hours. With real recorded tick data it would have taken 14 months at least, but even to be able to do that I should have recorded each and every tick on my MT4 the EURUSD market had produced since January of 2016... Which I have not done anyway.
AND FINALLY: I do not take neither DEMO nor BACKTEST results seriously. They are only good to provide an APPROXIMATE IDEA if an EA might be good or if it was outright bad. Since I do not trust DEMO results more than backtest results, I went ahead and started a REAL LIVE ACCOUNT FORWARD TEST, i.e. the VERY BEST TEST one can do on an EA.
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Dec 20, 2016 at 20:24
Here is a 6-year backtest report on M5. The profit factor is still good, although the maximum DD is almost double (-45%) than seen in the 2016 backtest.
Attachments:
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
forex_trader_253165
Member Since May 29, 2015
20 posts
Dec 20, 2016 at 22:14
(edited Dec 20, 2016 at 22:16)
well you should watch the whole thing and read the subtitle .:)
why mental institution.? Thats four years maybe I was the president of the united state and I just lost my job . :)
why mental institution.? Thats four years maybe I was the president of the united state and I just lost my job . :)
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Dec 20, 2016 at 22:18
Norbert5000 posted:
well you should watch the whole thing and read the subtitle .:)
why mental institution. Thats for years maybe I was the president for the united state and I just lost my job . :)
I have reported you to MyFXBook for spam - hopefully, you'll get banned soon.
forex_trader_253165
Member Since May 29, 2015
20 posts
Dec 20, 2016 at 22:28
I just showed you a video . I am not advertising anything.
Sorry , if I insulted you.
Sorry , if I insulted you.
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Dec 20, 2016 at 23:38
Norbert5000 posted:
I just showed you a video . I am not advertising anything.
Sorry , if I insulted you.
Your video does not belong here.
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Dec 21, 2016 at 03:11
(edited Dec 21, 2016 at 03:27)
Here is a 6-year backtest on the M15 version. In comparison with M5:
1. Profit Factor is significantly lower (1.68).
2. Expected payoff is slightly lower (10,250).
3. Relative drawdown is slightly worse (-49.6%).
4. Total net profit is only marginally better (8,775,160).
In summary: M5 has performed clearly better in this 6-year backtest, so I see no reason to run M15 alone or with M5.
1. Profit Factor is significantly lower (1.68).
2. Expected payoff is slightly lower (10,250).
3. Relative drawdown is slightly worse (-49.6%).
4. Total net profit is only marginally better (8,775,160).
In summary: M5 has performed clearly better in this 6-year backtest, so I see no reason to run M15 alone or with M5.
Attachments:
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Dec 21, 2016 at 03:23
(edited Dec 21, 2016 at 03:45)
Norbert5000 posted:
watch my video how to make 240k in 6 month
Come on Norbi... What was REALLY your point of showing a video about an account dating back to 2012...?? And especially in this completely unrelated thread... Puzzling... Mind boggling...
What has happened with that 290k since 2012...?
I guess you have lost all with a Martingale EA, or - if you were that smart - you must be already a millionaire and rubbing shoulders with the ''mutyi barons'' of Hungary on Rozsadomb...
Since you were showing an account from 2012 and not from 2016, I assume my first guess is more likely...
Attachments:
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Member Since Dec 04, 2010
1557 posts
Dec 21, 2016 at 04:04
(edited Dec 21, 2016 at 04:08)
fxMasterGuru, thanks for these backtests. very interesting that the M5 seems to be performing better than M15. Would it be possible for Vendor to tick the box that allows comments to show in history (or magic numbers), I believe the timeframes are contained here. Then we can do a customer analysis and decide based on at least the live data for this year, what the return would be for just M5, M15 and both together, and also the DD for each scenario. Cheers
