Inertia Trader (By babyjake1961)
The user has deleted this system.
Inertia Trader Discussion
Member Since Mar 15, 2010
30 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 00:05
There is no trade so far. Is this normal?
To get rich by consistent and safe means...
Member Since Dec 04, 2010
1557 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 04:10
babyjake1961 posted:FxMasterGuru posted:
At least now we all know that this EA's profitability is VERY BROKER SPECIFIC.
I have a smaller live account with Tickmill and have great results there too: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/babyjake1961/01062016/1651616/fKH5fPEbSIoKLFQbpbpM
Thanks for sharing this account. As was beginning to fear only worked on FXChoice and I wouldn't open account with a Belize regulated broker. Tickmill now has FCA regulation. I wonder if that reduced liquidity this time of year could have been responsible for the differences in the price feed between Ic Markets and FxChoice also?
Member Since Jun 25, 2013
48 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 07:47
I have a GBPUSD Bot started Dec 6 it has traded 7 times 4 losses and 3 wins up 15% overall.
Bob
Bob
Member Since Dec 04, 2010
1557 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 11:26
I see the same trade on tickmill on 3rd January performed better on tickmill by a large pip margin.
FXchoice trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.04.2017 18:20 EURUSD Buy 73.49 -41.10 167.60 1.04166 1.04847 68.1 49443.51 23h 50m 10.09%
Tickmill Trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.05.2017 02:05 EURUSD Buy 2.00 -60.20 197.90 1.04168 1.05239 107.1 2108.24 1d 5.28%
Are both accounts just running default risk settings?
The tickmill account has performed better at 30% per month, versus FX choice at 24.67% per month (since 1 June 2016 - using custom analysis). I use tickmill so good to know it runs on this broker without issues being FCA regulated non US clients would be advised to try it on tickmill, I believe. The November and December results for Tickmill and FxChoice percentage gains are very different, so it must be very broker sensitive. Which is okay as long as know which brokers it will do good on. Any other tried on? cheers
FXchoice trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.04.2017 18:20 EURUSD Buy 73.49 -41.10 167.60 1.04166 1.04847 68.1 49443.51 23h 50m 10.09%
Tickmill Trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.05.2017 02:05 EURUSD Buy 2.00 -60.20 197.90 1.04168 1.05239 107.1 2108.24 1d 5.28%
Are both accounts just running default risk settings?
The tickmill account has performed better at 30% per month, versus FX choice at 24.67% per month (since 1 June 2016 - using custom analysis). I use tickmill so good to know it runs on this broker without issues being FCA regulated non US clients would be advised to try it on tickmill, I believe. The November and December results for Tickmill and FxChoice percentage gains are very different, so it must be very broker sensitive. Which is okay as long as know which brokers it will do good on. Any other tried on? cheers
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 11:41
therichonedemo1 posted:Perfectly normal. There are no large price movements on Forex daily.
There is no trade so far. Is this normal?
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 11:42
aeronthomas posted:Brokers' price feeds are different because their liquidity providers are different.babyjake1961 posted:FxMasterGuru posted:
At least now we all know that this EA's profitability is VERY BROKER SPECIFIC.
I have a smaller live account with Tickmill and have great results there too: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/babyjake1961/01062016/1651616/fKH5fPEbSIoKLFQbpbpM
Thanks for sharing this account. As was beginning to fear only worked on FXChoice and I wouldn't open account with a Belize regulated broker. Tickmill now has FCA regulation. I wonder if that reduced liquidity this time of year could have been responsible for the differences in the price feed between Ic Markets and FxChoice also?
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 11:45
aeronthomas posted:The EA will do OK with any broker which has reasonable spreads and decent liquidity (no price gaps).
I see the same trade on tickmill on 3rd January performed better on tickmill by a large pip margin.
FXchoice trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.04.2017 18:20 EURUSD Buy 73.49 -41.10 167.60 1.04166 1.04847 68.1 49443.51 23h 50m 10.09%
Tickmill Trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.05.2017 02:05 EURUSD Buy 2.00 -60.20 197.90 1.04168 1.05239 107.1 2108.24 1d 5.28%
Are both accounts just running default risk settings?
The tickmill account has performed better at 30% per month, versus FX choice at 24.67% per month (since 1 June 2016 - using custom analysis). I use tickmill so good to know it runs on this broker without issues being FCA regulated non US clients would be advised to try it on tickmill, I believe. The November and December results for Tickmill and FxChoice percentage gains are very different, so it must be very broker sensitive. Which is okay as long as know which brokers it will do good on. Any other tried on? cheers
Member Since Dec 04, 2010
1557 posts
Jan 11, 2017 at 12:01
babyjake1961 posted:thanks for your replies.aeronthomas posted:The EA will do OK with any broker which has reasonable spreads and decent liquidity (no price gaps).
I see the same trade on tickmill on 3rd January performed better on tickmill by a large pip margin.
FXchoice trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.04.2017 18:20 EURUSD Buy 73.49 -41.10 167.60 1.04166 1.04847 68.1 49443.51 23h 50m 10.09%
Tickmill Trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.05.2017 02:05 EURUSD Buy 2.00 -60.20 197.90 1.04168 1.05239 107.1 2108.24 1d 5.28%
Are both accounts just running default risk settings?
The tickmill account has performed better at 30% per month, versus FX choice at 24.67% per month (since 1 June 2016 - using custom analysis). I use tickmill so good to know it runs on this broker without issues being FCA regulated non US clients would be advised to try it on tickmill, I believe. The November and December results for Tickmill and FxChoice percentage gains are very different, so it must be very broker sensitive. Which is okay as long as know which brokers it will do good on. Any other tried on? cheers
Jan 11, 2017 at 19:11
Just got first set of trades opened up on Varianse broker today. Reduced my lots to 0.05 as didn't want full exposure.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Tritan/gw-inertia/1929382
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Tritan/gw-inertia/1929382
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 08:10
'Another one bites the dust...'
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Member Since May 08, 2012
60 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 08:11
Anyone like me do not have any trades at all from yesterday?
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 08:26
FxMasterGuru posted:Are you desperate for quick superprofits?
'Another one bites the dust...'
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 08:31
SleepingFX posted:Did you have them on the previous trading days? If not, make sure you have ticked the 'Allow live trading' box in your MT4 and have otherwise set up the EA properly on your computer/VPS. If all of that has already been done, please, email [email protected] with your complete log files for assistance.
Anyone like me do not have any trades at all from yesterday?
Member Since May 04, 2012
1608 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 13:52
babyjake1961 posted:FxMasterGuru posted:Are you desperate for quick superprofits?
'Another one bites the dust...'
I wish I could see at least ONE trade ending in profit.
Is it too much to expect after shelling out hundreds of dollars for this broker specific EA...?
It seems that my FCA regulated pure DMA/STP broker with extra tight spreads is not good enough...
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 16:36
fxmill posted:Right. Both my FXChoice and Tickmill accounts show excellent profitability over time. Sure, there are occasional drawdowns but only scams don't have them.
If all of your trades are losers, clearly logic dictates it is time to question YOUR broker!
Jan 12, 2017 at 17:58
FxMasterGuru posted:babyjake1961 posted:FxMasterGuru posted:Are you desperate for quick superprofits?
'Another one bites the dust...'
I wish I could see at least ONE trade ending in profit.
Is it too much to expect after shelling out hundreds of dollars for this broker specific EA...?
It seems that my FCA regulated pure DMA/STP broker with extra tight spreads is not good enough...
fxmasterguru,
i think you need to step back and observe. this ea/strategy i been watching for a while is a good one. and no i did not buy it yet.
as with all strategies there can be huge differences from broker to broker, even from one account to the next, same broker.
this strategy is not a scam like most all, this one is the real deal.
i recommend you run on demo for a few months to get comfortable how it trades.
its break out based which is proven to be a good strategy, dd periods can will always be part of trading.
fidelitasllc@
Member Since Dec 07, 2009
134 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 18:05
I traded it this week and it is winning for me. I will say though that the default risk level is frightening and the accounts shared here have so far not really shown what a large drawdown might look like. I estimate that the trades open last night could have taken default accounts down another 30% had it not been for the recovery of the final open trades.
Personally I flinched and closed out the winners early so I could sleep without worrying and in hindsight I prevented huge additional wins. I have dialed it back to 50% of default now and will leave it alone.
Personally I flinched and closed out the winners early so I could sleep without worrying and in hindsight I prevented huge additional wins. I have dialed it back to 50% of default now and will leave it alone.
Be afraid, very afraid?
Member Since Mar 31, 2016
70 posts
Jan 12, 2017 at 22:17
Just google 'Inertia Trader MyFXBook' and you'll see links to people's statements with different brokers.
