- Home
- Community
- Trading Systems
- James Harrison
James Harrison (By MIA491)
Gain : | -51.04% |
Drawdown | 94.97% |
Pips: | 47857.0 |
Trades | 348 |
Won: |
|
Lost: |
|
Type: | Real |
Leverage: | 1:100 |
Trading: | Manual |
Edit Your Comment
James Harrison Discussion
Jun 05, 2019 at 10:18
Member Since Apr 18, 2015
2 posts
This broker has taken all the money from the investors. First, trust them for a few months with winning trades (all fakes) and then destroy the entire account to win millions with two losing trades (also fakes). It is not Broker, everything is cheating, because with a leverage of 1:100 in a legal Broker it would not ending in a negative balance in a market like that.
forex_trader_733411
Member Since Jun 06, 2019
1 posts
Jun 06, 2019 at 07:03
Member Since Jun 06, 2019
1 posts
one of my friend joined MIA and he told me that somehow the company was able to reset the system and got back his money and reduce his losses. How in the world would it be possible for someone to manipulate the MT4 platform after the trades had been closed??? Unless it was a platform all this while.
Member Since Jun 05, 2019
1 posts
Jun 07, 2019 at 10:02
Member Since Jun 07, 2019
1 posts
Notice from Mia investor site stating that the traders are unable to locate. Oh my, traders are Missing In Action!
Member Since Mar 08, 2019
2 posts
Jun 07, 2019 at 10:07
Member Since Mar 08, 2019
2 posts
It was bad martingale ((. They did trading ont the GOLD. You can see market GOLD and understand why they lost a money. Cheating is that they claimed that the master is trading manually with money management Any Martingale finish wit that result
Jun 07, 2019 at 10:13
Member Since Mar 09, 2018
143 posts
zubkoandriy posted:
It was bad martingale ((. They did trading ont the GOLD. You can see market GOLD and understand why they lost a money. Cheating is that they claimed that the master is trading manually with money management Any Martingale finish wit that result
Thats not the case. You should read the comments from a year ago when some of us knew this. They were not trading at al. I dont understand how people still think they were actually trading. No wonder they lost their money with that lack of knowledge and understanding of how this works...
Member Since Aug 05, 2016
133 posts
Jun 09, 2019 at 04:34
Member Since Aug 05, 2016
133 posts
I'm very sorry how ill-educated investors are, how little due diligence people perform before they invest in schemes like this one for copy trading and Fund investments.
I have spoken about these often on Donna Forex and ForexSignals Forum in my last 3 years of being a signal provider and fund manager.
Let's keep the industry free of this . I am extra vigilant on the platforms where my system is available to report suspicious systems who are only looking for quick subscription fees and investments that they can steal in a short amount of time and remain anonymous and leave without being caught online.
I have spoken about these often on Donna Forex and ForexSignals Forum in my last 3 years of being a signal provider and fund manager.
Let's keep the industry free of this . I am extra vigilant on the platforms where my system is available to report suspicious systems who are only looking for quick subscription fees and investments that they can steal in a short amount of time and remain anonymous and leave without being caught online.
PAM Fund (Mount Cook Financial). Please vouch for my system. “Learn from your mistakes and do not give up!”
Member Since Dec 22, 2018
11 posts
Jun 11, 2019 at 07:06
Member Since Mar 09, 2018
143 posts
VancouverRain posted:
Broker paid off the trader and screwed everyone else up. Simple story!
Simple story yet you got it wrong. Broker did not pay off the trader, there was never any trader. The money was deposited with the broker which was owned by the people involved in the so they paid off themselves. Thats the real story. Take the time and read the whole thread from the start. Some of us have been predicting this exact situation since last summer.
Jun 17, 2019 at 06:35
Member Since Aug 23, 2018
26 posts
sjkhaushu posted:
Any news about this? Is anyone investingating, trying to get their money back?
Money will be very difficult to be recovered ....
I think those who lives in malaysia should make POLICE REPORT about MIA Founder, and let police do the job ...
maybe in the end they will still be released .. but at least MIA founder should be questioned and hopefully covered by media.
I already try hard to explain to you all in this forum and lowyat forum .. all evidence about this money game ... and I just hope some of the readers not got scammed after read my posts.
Jul 03, 2019 at 08:49
Member Since Mar 14, 2018
2 posts
The writing is on the wall guys since the beginning ...MIA forex means Missing In Action (hello???)
This is nothing more that money game with forex twist
Early participants reap profits while late comers bite the lost. It's nothing new in this game.
This is nothing more that money game with forex twist
Early participants reap profits while late comers bite the lost. It's nothing new in this game.
Jul 11, 2019 at 08:55
Member Since Mar 09, 2018
143 posts
OutsideTheBoxHK posted:
I'm very sorry how ill-educated investors are, how little due diligence people perform before they invest in schemes like this one for copy trading and Fund investments.
I have spoken about these often on Donna Forex and ForexSignals Forum in my last 3 years of being a signal provider and fund manager.
Let's keep the industry free of this . I am extra vigilant on the platforms where my system is available to report suspicious systems who are only looking for quick subscription fees and investments that they can steal in a short amount of time and remain anonymous and leave without being caught online.
You are practically in the same boat. The only difference is they planned to steal the money and you lost it via incompetence. These guys were at least 'smart' about what they did. You really shouldnt be criticising others to make yourself look good if you are unable to back it up and wipe out every single account you have.
Jul 11, 2019 at 11:09
Member Since Dec 21, 2018
1 posts
Also, don't believe Signal Start neither, their Stats are fake. They cannot measure the Drawdown correctly. I was looking at one trader that had 20 successful trades, with a big lot size and all of them were taken at the same time and all went about 30 Pips into Drawdown. THe Trader had a max. 6 % DD. It was more like 50 % and I went back and forth with them, they tried not to reply but I stayed persistent. Here the answer from them in the end:
'Your calculations are correct, the drawdown would be ~50% by an Intra
day measurement,
We do not log intraday drawdown because we are limited by the amount
of data we can process.
The dev team is exploring the possibility of increasing the resolution.
Thanks,
Chris,
SignalStart Support'
'Your calculations are correct, the drawdown would be ~50% by an Intra
day measurement,
We do not log intraday drawdown because we are limited by the amount
of data we can process.
The dev team is exploring the possibility of increasing the resolution.
Thanks,
Chris,
SignalStart Support'
*Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.