SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) (由 andryuha77)
The user has made his system private.
Edit Your Comment
SystemsFX.net (andryuha77)討論
會員從May 21, 2010開始
13帖子
會員從Oct 18, 2009開始
7帖子
會員從May 21, 2010開始
13帖子
會員從May 21, 2010開始
13帖子
會員從Aug 20, 2009開始
208帖子
Oct 22, 2010 at 20:11
(已編輯Oct 22, 2010 at 20:35)
會員從Aug 20, 2009開始
208帖子
This system is the presently nr.1 ranked system at Zulutrade as far as I know:
http://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at http://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site http://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
http://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at http://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site http://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?

forex_trader_4072
會員從Dec 05, 2009開始
19帖子
Oct 23, 2010 at 03:28
會員從Dec 05, 2009開始
19帖子
stephanusR posted:
On this site http://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
Its in the top right hand corner of that page champ,
Recharge | Withdrawal, USD 48354.22 | -4449.17
I've been watching him on all those sites for a few months and his system does seem to work, though for followers using fixed lot size not so well. IE - zulutrade.

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。