SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) (By andryuha77)
The user has made his system private.
Edit Your Comment
SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) Discussion
Member Since May 21, 2010
13 posts
Member Since Oct 18, 2009
9 posts
Member Since May 21, 2010
13 posts
Oct 20, 2010 at 20:54
Member Since May 21, 2010
13 posts
88cefiro posted:In the majority subscribers are using fixed lots.
How would someone following your signal on zulutrade overcome the variable lot size? how should they set you up on there, fixed lots or variable lot size with % of balance?
Member Since May 21, 2010
13 posts
Member Since Aug 20, 2009
216 posts
Oct 22, 2010 at 20:11
(edited Oct 22, 2010 at 20:35)
Member Since Aug 20, 2009
216 posts
This system is the presently nr.1 ranked system at Zulutrade as far as I know:
https://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at https://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site https://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
https://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at https://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site https://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
forex_trader_4072
Member Since Dec 05, 2009
19 posts
Oct 23, 2010 at 03:28
Member Since Dec 05, 2009
19 posts
stephanusR posted:
On this site https://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
Its in the top right hand corner of that page champ,
Recharge | Withdrawal, USD 48354.22 | -4449.17
I've been watching him on all those sites for a few months and his system does seem to work, though for followers using fixed lot size not so well. IE - zulutrade.
*Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.